Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Instructional Effectiveness | 2 |
| Writing Skills | 2 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Biochemistry | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| Computer Software Evaluation | 1 |
| Content Area Writing | 1 |
| Courseware | 1 |
| Critical Thinking | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Gunersel, Adalet Baris | 2 |
| Aufderheide, Karl J. | 1 |
| Balester, Valerie | 1 |
| Hartberg, Yasha | 1 |
| Simpson, Nancy J. | 1 |
| Simspon, Nancy J. | 1 |
| Wang, Li | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Showing all 2 results
Peer reviewed
Download full textHartberg, Yasha; Gunersel, Adalet Baris; Simspon, Nancy J.; Balester, Valerie – Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2008
This study investigating the effectiveness of Calibrated Peer Review (CPR )[TM] in a senior-level biochemistry class had three purposes: to (a) compare the CPR process for feedback with TA-generated feedback in improving students' ability to write scientific abstracts; (b) compare CPR results for males and females; and (c) observe whether CPR…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Biochemistry, Writing Instruction, Gender Differences
Gunersel, Adalet Baris; Simpson, Nancy J.; Aufderheide, Karl J.; Wang, Li – Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2008
This study focuses on student development with Calibrated Peer Review (CPR)[TM], a web-based tool created to promote writing and critical thinking skills. Research questions focus on whether or not students showed improvement in writing and reviewing competency with repeated use of CPR in a senior-level biology course and whether the difference…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Biology, Critical Thinking, Writing Skills
