Publication Date
| In 2015 | 15 |
| Since 2014 | 131 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 606 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 1347 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 2238 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Csapo, Marg | 37 |
| McLaughlin, T. F. | 37 |
| Holowinsky, Ivan Z. | 18 |
| Carter, Mark | 16 |
| Kauffman, James M. | 15 |
| Lewis, Ann | 15 |
| Mastropieri, Margo A. | 13 |
| Norwich, Brahm | 13 |
| Tindal, Gerald | 13 |
| Wehmeyer, Michael L. | 13 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Showing 2,521 to 2,535 of 4,505 results
Peer reviewedDean, Raymond S. – Journal of Special Education, 1984
Research concerning lateralization of human brain functions is examined in light of the recent publication of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Following a review of research methodologies and functions ascribed to the hemispheres of the brain, differences are portrayed as complementary and coexisting modes of cognitive processing.…
Descriptors: Cerebral Dominance, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Secondary Education, Neurological Organization
Peer reviewedMajovski, Lawrence V. – Journal of Special Education, 1984
The article examines the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children as it applies to the assessment of childhood information processing strategies. Specific areas of discussion are: theoretical and research foundations at to its construct validity; usefulness in evaluating normal neuropsychological development; and its role in clinical research and…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Tests, Student Evaluation, Test Validity
Peer reviewedSternberg, Robert J. – Journal of Special Education, 1984
Positive and negative features of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children are examined from an information processing perspective. The author suggests that the test should not be used in place of the Stanford-Binet or the Wechsler Intelligence Scale-Revised. (CL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Tests, Test Use
Peer reviewedGoetz, Ernest T.; Hall, Robert J. – Journal of Special Education, 1984
Four areas of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children are critically examined from an information processing perspective: theory, tests, scales and scores, and interpretation and educational applications. It is concluded that the promise of a marked improvement in intellectual assessment went unfulfilled. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Tests, Scoring
Peer reviewedMehrens, William A. – Journal of Special Education, 1984
The Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children is reviewed with respect to manuals, test construction, and norming procedures; reliability; and validity; evidence administration and scoring procedures; types of scores and interpretative guidelines; and the bias issue. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Tests, Test Construction, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedTelzrow, Cathy F. – Journal of Special Education, 1984
Preliminary research suggests that the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) may be useful in identifying a variety of special needs in preschoolers, specific language disorders, and giftedness. Additional measures (such as measures of visual motor performance) may be appropriate in conjunction with the K-ABC. (CL)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Disabilities, Disability Identification, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedGunnison, Judy A. – Journal of Special Education, 1984
The article presents a schemata for using the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children to develop specific diagnosis and prescriptive programing for reading and learning disabled children. An educational program that focuses on the processing strength to formulate interventions that remediate the deficits through the preferred processing strategies…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Intervention
Peer reviewedSalvia, John; Hritcko, Terese – Journal of Special Education, 1984
Nine questions that link performance on the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children to classroom teaching and pupil learning were posed. Results revealed the absence of empirical validation for linking K-ABC scores and altered teaching methods to known and desirable outcomes. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Tests, Intervention
Peer reviewedAnastasi, Anne – Journal of Special Education, 1984
The Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children is examined with particular attention to evolution of current psychometric concepts and methods, as well as the historical sources of popular misconceptions. The K-ABC reveals sophisticated applications of current test construction methodology but requires knowledgeable examiners. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Aptitude Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedKeith, Timothy Z.; Dunbar, Stephen B. – Journal of Special Education, 1984
Data from the standardized sample were used to test alternate structures for the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, based on the hypothesis that the test measures verbal memory skills and verbal and nonverbal reasoning. Results suggest that the models fit the data fairly well, supporting the alternate structure's validity. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Tests, Models, Test Construction
Peer reviewedJensen, Arthur R. – Journal of Special Education, 1984
The author examines claims that the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) is less culturally biased than other standard tests of intelligence. He concludes that the diminished Black-White difference for the K-ABC is largely the result of psychometric and statistical artifacts. Implications for future test construction are noted.…
Descriptors: Blacks, Cultural Differences, Culture Fair Tests, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedKaufman, Alan S. – Journal of Special Education, 1984
A response to 13 articles on the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children address seven areas: validity, theory underlying the intelligence portion, role of the clinicians in intellectual assessment, distinction between ability and achievement, evaluation of alternate models, remedial applications of the sequential-simultaneous processing…
Descriptors: Cultural Differences, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Tests, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewedGraham, Steve; MacArthur, Charles – Journal of Special Education, 1988
Three learning-disabled students, aged 10-11, received self-instructional strategy training for improving revision skills for essays they composed on a word processor. Strategy instruction positively impacted on students' revising behavior and the length and quality of their written products. Effects were maintained over time and generalized to…
Descriptors: Autoinstructional Aids, Essays, Generalization, Intermediate Grades
Peer reviewedScruggs, Thomas E.; Mastropieri, Margo A. – Journal of Special Education, 1988
Gifted and nongifted students (n=96) in grades five-six were assigned to a free-study or one of three mnemonic conditions for learning mineral hardness levels. Both ability groups learned more in mnemonic conditions, and gifted students demonstrated an ability superior to nongifted students in employing mnemonic strategies independently in…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Generalization, Gifted, Intermediate Grades
Peer reviewedStone, C. Addison; Forman, Ellice A. – Journal of Special Education, 1988
Learning-disabled ninth-graders (n=58) completed a modified Piagetian isolation-of-variables task, and were compared to normally achieving ninth-graders and fourth-graders. Through cluster analysis, four different patterns of task approach were identified, representing normal performance, general conceptual disorder, specific developmental delay,…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cluster Analysis, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis


