Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 7 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 8 |
Descriptor
| Educational Philosophy | 5 |
| Brain | 2 |
| Educational Assessment | 2 |
| Educational Policy | 2 |
| Learning Disabilities | 2 |
| Alphabets | 1 |
| Art | 1 |
| Attitudes | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| Brain Hemisphere Functions | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Philosophy of… | 8 |
Author
| Davis, Andrew | 8 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 8 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Audience
| Policymakers | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Showing all 8 results
Davis, Andrew – Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2013
In this response, I agree with much of what Schrag says about the principled limits of neuroscience to inform educators' decisions about approaches to learning. However, I also raise questions about the extent to which discoveries about "deficits" in brain function could possibly help teachers. I dispute Schrag's view that externalism/internalism…
Descriptors: Neurology, Neurosciences, Brain, Educational Methods
Davis, Andrew – Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2012
In England, Higher Education institutions, together with the schools whose staff they train, are being required to incorporate synthetic phonics as one of the key approaches to the teaching of reading. Yet even if synthetic phonics can be identified as one of the component "skills" of reading, an assumption vigorously contested in this paper, it…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Reading Instruction, Teaching Methods
Davis, Andrew – Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2009
What is "fairness" in the context of educational assessment? I apply this question to a number of contemporary educational assessment practices and policies. My approach to philosophy of education owes much to Wittgenstein. A commentary set apart from the main body of the paper focuses on my style of philosophising. Wittgenstein teaches us to…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Test Validity, Equal Education, Value Judgment
Davis, Andrew – Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2008
I use Ian Hacking's views to explore ways of classifying people, exploiting his distinction between indifferent kinds and interactive kinds, and his accounts of how we "make up" people. The natural kind/essentialist approach to indifferent kinds is explored in some depth. I relate this to debates in psychiatry about the existence of mental…
Descriptors: Mental Disorders, Learning Disabilities, Definitions, Educational Philosophy
Davis, Andrew – Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2007
The Common School should promote a sense of the distinctive worth of all human beings. How is the respect thus owed to every individual to be properly understood? This familiar question is explored by discussing "lookism", a form of discrimination on the grounds of appearance. The treatment is located within a wider analysis of stereotyping.…
Descriptors: Democracy, Moral Values, Educational Philosophy, Social Discrimination
Davis, Andrew – Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2006
"High stakes testing" is to be understood as testing with serious consequences for students, their teachers and their educational institutions. It plays a central role in holding teachers and educational institutions to account. In a recent article Randall Curren seeks to refute a number of philosophical arguments developed in my "The Limits of…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Educational Assessment, Educational Philosophy, Reader Response
Davis, Andrew – Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2006
What do Elliot Eisner's discussions of objectivity mean for the strength of the link between consistency and truth in educational research? Following his lead, I pursue this question by comparing aspects of qualitative educational research with appraising the arts. I argue that some departures from the highest levels of consistency in assessing…
Descriptors: Reliability, Educational Research, Art, Ethics
Davis, Andrew – Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2004
This paper discusses the current fashion for brain-based learning, in which value-laden claims about learning are grounded in neurophysiology. It argues that brain science cannot have the authority about learning that some seek to give it. It goes on to discuss whether the claim that brain science is relevant to learning involves a category…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Brain, Learning Processes, Physiology

Peer reviewed
Direct link
