Publication Date
| In 2015 | 25 |
| Since 2014 | 83 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 299 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 668 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 1260 |
Descriptor
Author
| Swanson, H. Lee | 29 |
| Vaughn, Sharon | 27 |
| Adelman, Howard S. | 19 |
| Chandler, Harry N. | 19 |
| Fletcher, Jack M. | 19 |
| Fuchs, Lynn S. | 18 |
| Fuchs, Douglas | 17 |
| Gregg, Noel | 17 |
| Siegel, Linda S. | 16 |
| Torgesen, Joseph K. | 14 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 144 |
| Grade 3 | 52 |
| Grade 1 | 49 |
| Grade 2 | 49 |
| Grade 4 | 39 |
| Higher Education | 39 |
| Adult Education | 38 |
| Kindergarten | 36 |
| Grade 5 | 33 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 31 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
| Researchers | 253 |
| Practitioners | 208 |
| Teachers | 26 |
| Policymakers | 14 |
| Parents | 4 |
| Administrators | 3 |
| Community | 3 |
| Students | 2 |
| Counselors | 1 |
Showing 2,521 to 2,535 of 3,413 results
Peer reviewedThompson, J. S.; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980
It was concluded that computed axial tomography of the brain is not a necessary screening procedure in the evaluation of the child with minimal brain dysfunction or learning disabilities unless there is evidence of a focal neurologic deficit. (Author)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods, Exceptional Child Research, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedMiller, Maurice – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980
The author discusses conclusions presented in two artcles by H. Vance et al. titled "Determining WISC-R (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised) Profiles for Reading Disabled Children" and "Developing Remedial Hypotheses from Ability Profiles." The validity of five distinct WISC-R profiles for reading disabled students is questioned.…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Intelligence Tests, Reading Difficulties, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedWallbrown, Fred H.; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980
The authors reply to M. Miller's concerns regarding their work on Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) profiles for reading disabled children. Among the criticisms addressed are those dealing with subject sampling, Ss not fitting into the five WISC-R profiles, and factor analysis procedures used. (SBH)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Intelligence Tests, Reading Difficulties, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedMiller, Maurice – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980
The author responds to rebuttals by F. Wallbrown et al. regarding criticisms of their research on Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) profiles of reading disabled children. (SBH)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Intelligence Tests, Reading Difficulties, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedStevenson, Lillian P. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) protocols of 55 children (5 to 17 years old) referred for academic problems were examined using a factor-score approach in terms of clusters of subtests hypothesized to reflect functional differences in learning styles. (Author/SBH)
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Exceptional Child Research, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedScull, John W.; Brand, Linda Hill – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980
The study was designed to provide a comparison of Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT) and Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) scores in 49 learning disabled children (mean age 11 years at initial testing). (SBH)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Exceptional Child Research
Peer reviewedAbrams, Jules C. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
The author contends that, while visual defects should not be confused with defects in visual perception, the identification and treatment of visual problems is an important element in the diagnosis and remediation of learning disabilities. (Author)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedSuchoff, Irwin B. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
The article reviews and interprets some of the literature that has investigated the relationships between refractive status and reading and between binocular status and reading. The characterization of the visual process is pointed out as a major research problem. (Author)
Descriptors: Reading Difficulties, Research Methodology, Research Problems, Vision
Peer reviewedGetman, G. N. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
The author reviews aspects of visual integration which should be assessed in students with suspected learning problems: visually directed and monitored movements, visual tactual integrations, visual auditory language integrations, and visual systems integrations. (CL)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities, Sensory Integration
Peer reviewedWachs, Harry – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
The author discusses applying J. Piaget's philosophy to the treatment of learning-related visual problems by first probing for the available knowledge in the person's ocular sensorimotor intelligence, visual thinking, and logical reasons. Then, through tasks, the individual is encouraged to engage in high-level thinking in the undeveloped areas.…
Descriptors: Developmental Stages, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities, Vision
Peer reviewedForrest, Elliott B. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
The role of visual imagery is explored as an information processing strategy, and its relationship is counterpointed to the linguistic system. The importance of visual imagery as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool to aid both visual and nonvisual performance and learning problems is discussed. (Author)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Cognitive Processes, Imagery, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedLudlam, William M. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
The literature relating visual problems, reading, and academic difficulties with neurophysiological mechanisms shows positive interaction among these factors. Both visual-evoked response and encephalographic studies show parietal or occipitoparietal neurophysiological anomalies which can be used to discriminate between normal and disabled readers…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Learning Disabilities, Neurological Impairments, Reading Difficulties
Peer reviewedKerr, Andrew S.; Meunier, Clement P. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
A 40-item speech/sound discrimination test was administered to 158 children (6 to 9 years old) to assess the effects of socioeconomic level and administrative mode, oral or tape, on auditory discrimination ability. Results indicated a model of administration effect, age effect, and an interaction between age and socioeconomic level. (Author)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Tests, Elementary Education, Socioeconomic Influences
Peer reviewedFabian, Judith J.; Jacobs, Ursula W. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
The Canter Background Interference Procedure of the Bender Gestalt Test and the Quick Neurological Screening Test were found to discriminate neurological/organic signs in 23 adolescent learning disabled students. Methodological problems, research needs, and implications for the use of these tests are discussed. (Author)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Clinical Diagnosis, Learning Disabilities, Neurological Impairments
Peer reviewedFayne, Harriet R. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
To investigate differences between learning disabled and nonhandicapped adolescents in comprehension of pronoun-antecedent relationships, a pronoun reference task was administered to 75 learning disabled (LD), nonacademic, and academic 10th and 11th graders in a middle-class suburban high school. Results indicated that LD students may have…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Comprehension, Cues, High Schools


