Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 12 |
Descriptor
Source
| Journal of Education for… | 12 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 12 |
| Opinion Papers | 12 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Showing all 12 results
Betts, Julian R. – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2009
In a series of reforms started in 1998 and formalized with the 2000 introduction of the Blueprint for Student Success, the San Diego Unified School District (SDUSD) implemented a wide-ranging series of reforms designed to boost the literacy skills of students. This article provides an overview of the reforms, assesses the contributions made by the…
Descriptors: Reading Achievement, Educational Change, Statistical Analysis, Literacy
Peer reviewedSilbert, Jerry – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2002
Discusses the potential of the Direct Instruction (DI) model to improve reading comprehension among children in high poverty schools, noting conditions under which the DI model will produce maximum gains in reading comprehension. The paper summarizes articles from this theme issue, which provide evidence that the DI model does improve student…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, High Risk Students, Poverty, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewedRosenshine, Barak – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2002
Critiques research on the effectiveness of Direct Instruction (DI) over the past 3 decades, examining decreasing scores, variations in DI, instructional implementation, three approaches to improving instruction, the problem of outside demands, the problem of teacher turnover, phonics and comprehension, settings for instruction, and additional…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, High Risk Students, Low Income Groups, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewedHatch, Thomas – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2000
Examines experiences and evaluations of the New American Schools design teams and other whole-school reform efforts, focusing on challenges in the scale-up effort and suggesting that there are some designs that are effective in making improvements in some aspects of schooling in some places at some times. Discusses how to fulfill the promises of…
Descriptors: Educational Change, Educational Improvement, Elementary Secondary Education, Program Design
Peer reviewedTharp, Roland G.; Lewis, Hayes; Hilberg, Ruth; Bird, Carlotta; Epaloose, Georgia; Dalton, Stephanie S.; Youpa, Daniel G.; Rivera, Hector; Feathers, Marilyn Riding In; Eriacho, Wilfred, Sr. – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1999
Explores the educational obstacles faced by Native Americans specific to their sociohistorical contexts. Seven specific obstacles and how they can be overcome through changes to structure, content, and processes are illustrated from work with Zuni students in New Mexico. (SLD)
Descriptors: American Indian History, American Indian Reservations, American Indians, Disadvantaged Youth
Peer reviewedPlunkett, Virginia R. L. – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1998
Many areas in education need better balance. These include balancing phonics and whole language approaches in teaching reading, balancing approaches in teaching spelling, and balancing curriculum content so that art, music, and drama are included. (SLD)
Descriptors: Art Education, Curriculum Development, Elementary Secondary Education, Reading Instruction
Peer reviewedLe Tendre, Mary Jean – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1997
Funds from Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act and its successive amendments provide school districts with the means to help children who are often served last, those in high poverty schools. Homeless, migrant, neglected, and delinquent children are among those to whom Title I can give a voice. (SLD)
Descriptors: Child Neglect, Compensatory Education, Delinquency, Disadvantaged Youth
Peer reviewedPlunkett, Virginia R. L. – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1997
As educators work to pull together the various components of the Improving America's Schools Act, they must not lose sight of its central purpose, increasing children's learning. Guidance and assistance for low-achieving students must accompany a mind-set of higher expectations for achievement. (SLD)
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Counseling, Disadvantaged Youth, Educational Improvement
Peer reviewedCarroll, Janet – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1996
Addresses the issue of Title I student assessment for at-risk students and the possible funding ramifications if Title I schools reduce the frequency and coverage of their assessments. It argues that continued Congressional funding of Title I programs will be difficult if sufficient assessments cannot reveal positive impact. (GR)
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Economically Disadvantaged, Educationally Disadvantaged, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedBeach, Mary-Elizabeth – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1996
Learning environments and assessments must be designed to include homeless children in their reform efforts. Although homelessness is not a problem educators can solve, they must be sure that they do not contribute to its problems through neglect of disadvantaged children. (SLD)
Descriptors: Children, Disadvantaged Youth, Educational Assessment, Educational Change
Peer reviewedCarroll, Janet – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1996
Argues that policy development framework for school reform under the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 must occur in state and local settings and possess advocates for at-risk students who can enter the community dialog concerning education. Policies should focus on the classroom with administrators and teachers continually striving for…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Advocacy, At Risk Persons, Economically Disadvantaged
Peer reviewedCarroll, Janet – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1996
What advocates have done in support of the policies fostered under Title I through its 30-year history must be reconsidered in order to influence policymakers. As advocates, educators must collaborate with their partners in the health and social service communities in pursuit of coherence and congruence of programs. (SLD)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Compensatory Education, Cooperation, Educational History

Direct link
