Compared the "hybrid" Test of Understanding in College Economics (TUCE) with the four original TUCE versions and found that the hybrid version is 1) "broader,""thinner," and less technical in terms of content coverage; 2) more reliable with a generally superior item analysis structure; and 3) slightly "easier" for students who have taken economics…

Evaluates the Joint Council on Economic Education (JCEE) commitment to strengthening the Developmental Economic Education Program (DEEP). Suggests which future studies would be most valuable and which kinds of research tools and programs might be required to fulfill the objectives of DEEP. (BSR)

This article offers another critique of Robert Heilbroner's (see SO516704) proposal for change in the teaching of economics. Among the criticisms rendered is the point that Heilbroner's statistical, ideological, and historical perspective would not be intellectually feasible for the vast majority of students in elementary and secondary schools.…

Although college students with high school economics have a higher knowledge of economic concepts, they still could use practice in applying these concepts before moving on to more concepts and analytical refinements." This and other conclusions are partly based on author's research at Carnegie-Mellon University. (DB)

Students of graduate instructors in principles of economics courses learned as much as students of regular faculty members. They also rated their instructors lower, although they received higher grades. The results are compared with those of Lamphear and McConnell (EJ 026 801) and Oates and Quandt (EJ 026 800). (IM)

Discusses the content and cognitive specification of the third edition of the Test of Understanding in College Economics. Presents examples of the construction and sampling criteria employed in the latest and previous versions of the test. Explains that the test emphasizes recognition and understanding of basic terms, concepts, and principles with…