Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 3 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| College Students | 2 |
| Reliability | 2 |
| Validity | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Freshmen | 1 |
| College Science | 1 |
| Courses | 1 |
| Critical Thinking | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Abu Kassim, Noor Lide | 1 |
| Bassiri, Dina | 1 |
| Bell, John D. | 1 |
| Bradshaw, William S. | 1 |
| Kitchen, Elizabeth | 1 |
| Mat Daud, Nuraihan | 1 |
| Reeve, Suzanne | 1 |
| Schulz, E. Mathew | 1 |
| Sudweeks, Richard R. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Showing all 3 results
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMat Daud, Nuraihan; Abu Kassim, Noor Lide – Journal of Applied Measurement, 2011
Students' evaluations of teaching staff can be considered high-stakes, as they are often used to determine promotion, reappointment, and merit pay to academics. Using Facets, the reliability and validity of one student rating questionnaire is analysed. A total of 13,940 respondents of the Human Science Division of International Islamic University…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, Questionnaires, Validity, Reliability
Bassiri, Dina; Schulz, E. Mathew – Journal of Applied Measurement, 2011
In this study, the Rasch rating scale model (Andrich, 1978) was applied to college grades of four freshman cohorts from a large public university. After editing, the data represented approximately 34,000 students, 1,700 courses and 119 departments. The rating scale model analysis yielded measures of student achievement and course difficulty.…
Descriptors: Grade Point Average, Courses, Difficulty Level, Academic Achievement
Reeve, Suzanne; Kitchen, Elizabeth; Sudweeks, Richard R.; Bell, John D.; Bradshaw, William S. – Journal of Applied Measurement, 2011
This article describes the development of a ten-item scale to assess biology majors' self-efficacy towards the critical thinking and data analysis skills taught in an upper-division cell biology course. The original seven-item scale was expanded to include three additional items based on the results of item analysis. Evidence of reliability and…
Descriptors: Majors (Students), Self Efficacy, Measures (Individuals), Biology
