Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| College Students | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Formative Evaluation | 1 |
| Grade 12 | 1 |
| Grade Point Average | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Schulz, E. Matthew | 3 |
| Bassiri, Dina | 1 |
| Lei, Pui-Wa | 1 |
| Mitzel, Howard C. | 1 |
| Sun, Anji | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 12 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Showing all 3 results
Direct linkSchulz, E. Matthew; Mitzel, Howard C. – Journal of Applied Measurement, 2011
This article describes a Mapmark standard setting procedure, developed under contract with the National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB). The procedure enhances the bookmark method with spatially representative item maps, holistic feedback, and an emphasis on independent judgment. A rationale for these enhancements, and the bookmark method, is…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Methods, National Competency Tests, Grade 12
Peer reviewedLei, Pui-Wa; Bassiri, Dina; Schulz, E. Matthew – Journal of Applied Measurement, 2003
Compared the performance of four polytomous item response theory (IRT) and three linear models for constructing adjusted grade-point-average (GPA) measures. Studies involving cohorts of 1,255 and 1,796 college students and an additional 1,823 and 1,879 college students. Discusses implications of findings for correlation of grade-based measures and…
Descriptors: College Students, Computer Software, Correlation, Grade Point Average
Peer reviewedSchulz, E. Matthew; Sun, Anji – Journal of Applied Measurement, 2001
Applied the rating scale model (D. Andrich, 1978) to data from a survey of student satisfaction with college services using data from a single college with item samples sizes ranging from 2 to 355. Compared to items' average ratings, item parameter estimates in the rating scale model did a better job of predicting the item receiving the higher…
Descriptors: College Students, Higher Education, Likert Scales, Rating Scales
