Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Alternative Assessment | 1 |
| Classroom Environment | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Cooperative Learning | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Experiments | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Genetics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| International Journal of… | 2 |
Author
| Desrochers, Marcie N. | 2 |
| Fink, Herbert C. | 1 |
| Kimmerling, Joe | 1 |
| Knapp, F. Andrew | 1 |
| Thomas, Andrea | 1 |
| Tung, Wendy | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Showing all 2 results
Peer reviewed
Download full textKnapp, F. Andrew; Desrochers, Marcie N. – International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2009
Student response systems (SRSs) are increasingly being used in the classroom. However, there have been few well-controlled experimental evaluations to determine whether students benefit academically from these instructional tools. Additionally, comparisons of SRS with other interactive methods have not often been conducted. We compared SRS,…
Descriptors: Student Reaction, Instructional Effectiveness, Teaching Methods, Comparative Analysis
Desrochers, Marcie N.; Fink, Herbert C.; Thomas, Andrea; Kimmerling, Joe; Tung, Wendy – International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2007
Alternatives to a solitary testing format can involve students working in teams to arrive at the correct answer. We compared two group assessment methods, cooperative and competitive, to a solitary testing approach. In most comparisons examining the undergraduate respondents' (N = 77) performance, the two group-testing methods were equivalent.…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Alternative Assessment, Group Testing
