Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Instructional Leadership | 2 |
| Manipulative Materials | 2 |
| Methods | 2 |
| Psychotherapy | 2 |
| Reflection | 2 |
| Religious Factors | 2 |
| Adjustment (to Environment) | 1 |
| Administrator Education | 1 |
| Beliefs | 1 |
| Career Choice | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| International Journal of… | 3 |
Author
| Mayes, Clifford | 3 |
| Mayes, Pamela Blackwell | 3 |
| Williams, Ellen | 3 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Showing all 3 results
Mayes, Clifford; Mayes, Pamela Blackwell; Williams, Ellen – International Journal of Leadership in Education, 2007
The present study is a follow-up study to the initial study that appeared in "International Journal of Leadership in Education", 7(3), 257-284. In this second study, the authors compared the standtrays of the students in the first study with the sandtrays that they did at the end of their one-year program in BYU's Leadership Preparation Program…
Descriptors: Leadership Training, Followup Studies, Instructional Leadership, Administrator Education
Mayes, Clifford; Mayes, Pamela Blackwell; Williams, Ellen – International Journal of Leadership in Education, 2004
The authors describe and use a psychotherapeutic modality known as sandtray therapy in order to help thirteen veteran teachers in the graduate educational leadership program at Brigham Young University reflect on the biographical, critical, and spiritual dimensions of their sense of calling as educational leaders. The authors first look at…
Descriptors: Preservice Teacher Education, Psychotherapy, Methods, Reflection
Mayes, Clifford; Mayes, Pamela Blackwell; Williams, Ellen – International Journal of Leadership in Education, 2004
Alan Block's (2004) major criticism of the authors' study revolves around the notion that they have attempted to quantify their students' sense of calling in an existentially inauthentic, spiritually delimiting way. For, as he puts it, "identifications of presence are impossible." The authors cannot accept this pronouncement if only for the simple…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Persuasive Discourse, Religious Factors, Beliefs

Peer reviewed
Direct link
