Descriptor
| Adults | 3 |
| Age Differences | 3 |
| Children | 3 |
| Spatial Ability | 3 |
| Cognitive Development | 2 |
| Ambiguity | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Concept Formation | 1 |
| Cross Cultural Studies | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| International Journal of… | 5 |
Author
| Cox, M. V. | 5 |
| Martin, A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Showing all 5 results
Peer reviewedCox, M. V. – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1978
Reports results of a study of the development of perspective-taking skills of 180 English children aged six through ten. Children first are able to represent the object nearest the observer, then before-behind relationships, and subsequently left-right relationships between objects. Questions Piagetian conclusions that perspective-taking ability…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Developmental Stages, Elementary School Students, Perceptual Development
Peer reviewedCox, M. V. – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1985
Children and adults normally interpret the spatial expressions "in front of" and "behind" in a nondeictic way when fronted objects are used. Two experiments involving a treasure hunt game investigated subjects' (6 to 10 years and adults) awareness of an alternative, deictic interpretation. (Author/BE)
Descriptors: Adults, Ambiguity, Children, Spatial Ability
Peer reviewedCox, M. V.; Martin, A. – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1988
Two experiments investigated children's tendencies to draw what they know rather than what they see. The first experiment looked at the way children, aged five to nine, and adults represent an object occluded by another object. Most subjects drew only what they could see. The second experiment investigated subjects' interpretation of pictures…
Descriptors: Adults, Cognitive Development, Freehand Drawing, Psychological Studies
Peer reviewedCox, M. V.; And Others – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1981
Bengali, English, and Hindi-speaking children five to nine years old were asked to place an object in front of or behind objects with or without obvious fronts. All children responded on the basis of an inherent object cue when a fronted object was used. When a nonfronted object was used, all children treated it as a fronted object. (Author/MP)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Comparative Analysis, Cross Cultural Studies
Peer reviewedCox, M. V. – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1981
Children and adults were asked to place something "in front of" or "behind" a featured or nonfeatured object. Most subjects responded to the object's inherent features. A significant number of adults used the observer orientation cue. Children had more difficulty with the nonfeatured object but also used the observer orientation cue. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Children, Cognitive Development


