NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
50 Years of ERIC
50 Years of ERIC
The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) is celebrating its 50th Birthday! First opened on May 15th, 1964 ERIC continues the long tradition of ongoing innovation and enhancement.

Learn more about the history of ERIC here. PDF icon

Showing all 8 results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Achtemeier, Sue D.; Simpson, Ronald D. – Innovative Higher Education, 2005
The qualitative study on which this article is based examined key individuals' perceptions, both within a research university community and beyond in its external governing board, of how to improve benchmarking as an accountability method in higher education. Differing understanding of benchmarking revealed practical implications for using it as…
Descriptors: Research Universities, Benchmarking, Accountability, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Diehl, Paul F.; Simpson, Ronald D. – Innovative Higher Education, 1989
The University of Georgia has implemented a program in which junior faculty members are matched with senior faculty mentors. Despite some scheduling problems, the program has succeeded in providing participants with valuable suggestions on improvement of classroom practices. (MSE)
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, College Faculty, Faculty Development, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Simpson, Ronald D. – Innovative Higher Education, 1987
A discussion of the importance of faculty renewal and positive attitudes toward teaching suggests five ways to keep energy and excitement in teaching, including focusing more on students, allowing students more responsibility, using varied teaching methods, taking on teaching challenges, and planning periodic activities away from the classroom.…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, College Faculty, College Instruction, Educational Innovation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Simpson, Ronald D. – Innovative Higher Education, 1995
While student evaluations of teaching performance can provide useful feedback on faculty, particularly on dimensions of course delivery, there are serious limitations. Bias and distrust are often overlooked in interpreting student ratings. An inappropriate use is in rank-ordering faculty in a department. Student evaluation data must be integrated…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Kathleen S.; Simpson, Ronald D. – Innovative Higher Education, 1995
A survey of 31 instructional leaders in higher education investigated their perceptions of the importance of 26 teaching competencies in effective college instruction. Results confirmed that, for the most part, these competencies were considered essential and were found comparable to competencies identified for teaching assistants in previous…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Delphi Technique, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Simpson, Ronald D. – Innovative Higher Education, 1991
The viewpoint that a college teacher's knowledge of subject matter is sufficient for good teaching is criticized because it (1) suggests that the teaching process requires minimum commitment and effort; (2) fails to value appropriately the needs of students; and (3) connotes closed-mindedness, even arrogance, at odds with productive human…
Descriptors: College Instruction, Higher Education, Instructional Effectiveness, Knowledge Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gaff, Jerry G.; Simpson, Ronald D. – Innovative Higher Education, 1994
A discussion of college faculty development in the United States reviews the past 30 years' history and considers what is needed for the movement to be fully institutionalized. A broader approach to faculty development, addressing all areas of faculty endeavor and not just scholarly pursuits, is recommended. (MSE)
Descriptors: Change Strategies, College Faculty, College Instruction, Educational Change
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Simpson, Ronald D.; Smith, Kathleen S. – Innovative Higher Education, 1993
A study used the Delphi technique to validate teaching competencies of graduate teaching assistants. A panel of 17 experts in teaching assistant support and training validated 26 competencies as important but also suggested some depend on specific responsibilities assigned to the teaching assistants. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Delphi Technique, Graduate Students, Higher Education