Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Content Analysis | 2 |
| Information Science | 2 |
| Biology | 1 |
| Criteria | 1 |
| Criticism | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Databases | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Diaries | 1 |
| Electronic Publishing | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Information Research: An… | 2 |
Author
| Kloda, Lorie A. | 2 |
| Bartlett, Joan C. | 1 |
| Ishimura, Yusuke | 1 |
| Koufogiannakis, Denise | 1 |
| Mallan, Katrine | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Showing all 2 results
Kloda, Lorie A.; Koufogiannakis, Denise; Mallan, Katrine – Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 2011
Introduction: Critical appraisal is a crucial aspect of evidence-based practice. In order to determine whether research is valid, reliable and applicable, the evidence-based practice process advocates that published research be critically appraised. Between 2006 and 2008, the journal Evidence Based Library and Information Practice published 101…
Descriptors: Information Science, Library Research, Evidence, Content Analysis
Bartlett, Joan C.; Ishimura, Yusuke; Kloda, Lorie A. – Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 2011
Purpose: The objective was to identify and understand the factors involved in scientists' selection of preferred bioinformatics tools, such as databases of gene or protein sequence information (e.g., GenBank) or programs that manipulate and analyse biological data (e.g., BLAST). Methods: Eight scientists maintained research diaries for a two-week…
Descriptors: Scientists, Criteria, Decision Making, Research

Peer reviewed
