NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
50 Years of ERIC
50 Years of ERIC
The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) is celebrating its 50th Birthday! First opened on May 15th, 1964 ERIC continues the long tradition of ongoing innovation and enhancement.

Learn more about the history of ERIC here. PDF icon

Showing all 8 results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Evans, G. R. – Higher Education Review, 2011
In November 2010, the British Government, modifying one of the proposals in the Browne Report published in October, decided to allow English universities to charge tuition fees of up to 9,000 British Pounds, while removing almost all the public funding previously provided in the form of a block grant. This had consequences the Government should…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Federal Government, Educational Finance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Evans, G. R. – Higher Education Review, 2011
The sector is entering a climate of future funding cuts and fee rises, which are likely to prompt a growing number and widening range of disputes. This article describes the launch of a new Improving Dispute Resolution Advisory Service. The particular questions raised in this context by the introduction of student charters and the relationship of…
Descriptors: Conflict Resolution, Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Intellectual Property
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Evans, G. R. – Higher Education Review, 2010
The doctrine of university autonomy in the UK contains a least two major "fault-lines" where the structure is inherently weak and there is danger of functional breakdown. The first occurs at the junction between the institution and the state, the second within the institution, where the unity in policy-making between academic and…
Descriptors: Institutional Autonomy, Foreign Countries, Government School Relationship, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Evans, G. R. – Higher Education Review, 2009
After its recent Assurance visit from HEFCE, Oxford went through a high profile public debate at the end of which its academic community voted against moving to a governance structure which would have given Oxford a majority of external members on its Council. The Higher Education Funding Council asked Oxford to answer eight questions justifying…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Governance, Educational Administration, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Evans, G. R. – Higher Education Review, 2009
The need for reform of university governance has recently come into question with a series of high profile examples of the apparent failure of the standard "sector norm" model among the post-1992 universities, at London Metropolitan, Leeds Metropolitan and East London Universities. This article takes forward the discussion in two previous (Evans,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Governance, Educational Change
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Evans, G. R. – Higher Education Review, 2008
In a previous article (Evans, 2007) I explored some of the challenges HEFCE has recently presented to Oxford and Cambridge governance. These are far from over, with HEFCE insisting that Oxford answer eight "questions" later this year and Cambridge throwing down the gauntlet, with a ballot on the modest attempt to raise the number of external…
Descriptors: Governance, Higher Education, Foreign Countries, Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Evans, G. R. – Higher Education Review, 2006
The Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration proposed a business model for universities in 2003. Pressure to change university governance to make it match the business model remains strong, and it is being most actively applied to Oxford and Cambridge. The Oxford and Cambridge governance debates (which began in the 1990s) open up the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Governance, Cooperation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Evans, G. R. – Higher Education Review, 2000
Discusses the 1992 British Education Reform Act and identifies weaknesses in the existing accountability structures in both old and new universities and related implications for academic freedom. Argues that reviewing the quality of the administration may be as important reviewing the quality of teaching and research. (DB)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Accountability, College Administration, Educational Legislation