In order to remain relevant and useful, testing programs must periodically update their tests to match shifts in student populations and school curricula. One might think that because the publishers are offering a product, the responsibility for updates rests entirely on them. Publishers conduct studies to assure new content is appropriate. But the truth is, motivated test takers are needed to properly evaluate individual questions and the validity of an updated instrument. Motivated users of the exams results--mostly admissions personnel--are also key players in the validity drama. Recent discussion among schools and blogs and test prep organizations suggesting that a "serious" use of a new section in admissions is easily postponed, does a disservice to test takers, test publishers, and to schools themselves because the longer it takes to get good data, the longer it will take to confirm the test's validity and to solidify its use as a reliable admissions tool.