NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
50 Years of ERIC
50 Years of ERIC
The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) is celebrating its 50th Birthday! First opened on May 15th, 1964 ERIC continues the long tradition of ongoing innovation and enhancement.

Learn more about the history of ERIC here. PDF icon

Showing 121 to 135 of 1,218 results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Martin, Laurie T.; Burns, Rachel M.; Schonlau, Matthias – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2010
Given the ongoing debate over whether giftedness is associated with mental health disorders, there is a great need to highlight and compare results from the most methodologically rigorous studies. Surprisingly, the vast majority of literature reviews and background sections of research articles include studies that do not directly compare gifted…
Descriptors: Gifted, Mental Disorders, Mental Health, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yoon, Cho-Hee – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2009
This correlational study investigated the direct and indirect effects of instructional factors and motivational and cognitive components of self-regulated learning on scientific inquiry performance in a sample of scientifically gifted middle school students. A total of 166 students were selected from nine gifted classes in the public school system…
Descriptors: Middle School Students, Self Efficacy, Path Analysis, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Reis, Sally M.; Renzulli, Joseph S. – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2009
This myth that the gifted constitute a single, homogeneous group is addressed by the authors in this article. They respond by saying that there is no single homogeneous group of gifted children and adults, and giftedness is developmental, not fixed at birth. Research in the past few decades has pointed to the ways in which gifts and talents vary,…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Misconceptions, Individual Characteristics, Developmental Stages
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Robinson, Ann – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2009
More than 25 years ago, the myth that a small gifted program compensated for a "sick" regular education program took its place in the "Gifted Child Quarterly" special issue pantheon. The myth was framed from the perspective of school districts who implemented limited, part-time programs for gifted students to "comfort themselves" that the needs of…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Federal Legislation, Misconceptions, Special Needs Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gentry, Marcia – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2009
To determine whether having a program is sufficient one must first define what is meant by "program." If by program one refers to the pullout program in the elementary school, or the afterschool enrichment program in the middle school, or the Advanced Placement program in the high school, or the hockey program, then certainly having a "program" is…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Enrichment Activities, Advanced Placement Programs, Special Needs Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
VanTassel-Baska, Joyce – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2009
The idea of integrating programs for the gifted into the total fabric of the school program is so central to the work of the field in the last 20 years or so that it is hard to believe that the myth of separatism is still alive and well. There is little question but that gifted programs must show a connection to the work that all of public…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Inclusive Schools, Cluster Grouping, Public Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sisk, Dorothy – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2009
With most gifted students being educated in a mainstream model of education, the prevailing myth that the regular classroom teacher can "go it alone" and the companion myth that the teacher can provide for the education of gifted students through differentiation are alive and well. In reality, the regular classroom teacher is too often concerned…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, School Culture, Misconceptions, Standardized Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Adams, Cheryll M. – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2009
Just as in 1982, when the myth of waiting for Santa Claus was first addressed in "Gifted Child Quarterly," many districts all over the country are still waiting for Santa Claus to arrive with a sleigh full of presents. Unfortunately, Santa and his presents in the form of mandates to identify and serve, funding, teachers licensed in gifted…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Misconceptions, Teaching Methods, Program Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moon, Sidney M. – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2009
One rationale for failure to address the needs of high-ability students in schools is that high-ability students do not need special services because they do not face any special problems or challenges. A more extreme corollary of this attitude is the notion that high ability is so protective that students with high ability do not face problems or…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Teaching Methods, High Achievement, Student Needs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moon, Tonya R. – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2009
The myth equating high-stakes testing with rigor and difficulty is one that can be debunked given the empirical work that has been conducted in this area. To completely debunk this myth in gifted education, the field must centralize efforts. Educators need to consider alternatives to the current system of assessment and the delivery of…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Misconceptions, Testing, High Stakes Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peterson, Jean Sunde – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2009
Empirical and clinical literatures have challenged the myth that gifted students do not have unique social and emotional concerns. When this myth prevails, pertinent concerns are not recognized and addressed formally or informally, proactively or reactively. Educators, parents, coaches, and even counselors may miss indications of distress. Lack of…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Misconceptions, Emotional Development, Student Needs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cooper, Carolyn R. – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2009
Fairness is often considered synonymous with equality: the equal treatment of people sharing a uniform description or role. This concept--"fair" means "equal"--has spawned the notion that it is fair to teach all children the same way. Put simply, if fairness means equality in family life, restaurant dining, and sports--not to mention in observing…
Descriptors: Equal Education, Teaching Methods, Misconceptions, Academically Gifted
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gallagher, Shelagh A. – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2009
Is it a myth that Advanced Placement (AP) is an adequate program for gifted students? AP is so covered with myths and assumptions that it is hard to get a clear view of the issues. In this article, the author finds the answer about AP by looking at current realties. First, AP is hard for gifted students to avoid. Second, AP never was a program…
Descriptors: Advanced Courses, Advanced Placement, Academically Gifted, Misconceptions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Borland, James H. – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2009
The myth that gifted children constitute 3% to 5% of the school population was addressed in the 1982 issue of the "Gifted Child Quarterly" by Joe Renzulli, a fact that is more than a little intimidating to one charged with addressing the same myth 27 years later. In his 1982 article, Renzulli interpreted the 3% to 5% myth as an implicit…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Misconceptions, Intelligence Quotient, Psychometrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Callahan, Carolyn M. – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2009
The evolution of several interrelated myths reflects a combination of misinterpretation of statistics, the commendable intention of ensuring that bias and prejudice do not play roles in the provision of services to underrepresented populations of gifted students, and misapplication of programming options for gifted students. Separately, these…
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Academically Gifted, Low Income Groups, Disproportionate Representation
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  ...  |  82