Proposes the theoretical reappropriation of the labeling perspective as a theory of transformative social valuing, considering how misappropriations of labeling deviance theory undercut the salience of its critique and legitimate segregationist and deficit models of remedial and special education. The paper asserts that if there is to be any…

Explores culturally responsive epistemologies and pedagogies in online education that integrate differences (e.g., race, gender, ethnicity, sexuality, and physical ability); open-endedness; and conductive reasoning through practices of collage, appropriation, and fragmentation, proposing online education practices that possess greater sensitivity…

Introduces eight essays inspired by Rene Arcilla's essay, "Why Aren't Philosophers and Educators Speaking to One Another?" The essays focus on the decreased visibility and influence of philosophy of education on the community of educators. Some essays agree that the problem exists but disagree about its causes and remedy, while others deny that…

Agrees with Rene Arcilla that philosophy of education is a marginalized discourse caught in the tension between academic (philosophical) credibility and practical (educational) relevance, suggesting that the greatest threat is in failing at both. The essay offers historical background and context for this debate, showing how it has recently…

Responds to Rene Arcilla's article, "Why Aren't Philosophers and Educators Speaking to One Another?" suggesting that Deweyan philosophy of education is not the whole of philosophy of education, noting difficulties with the Deweyan view with which Arcilla is concerned, discussing problems with Arcilla's analysis of both the Deweyan view and the…

Responds to Rene Arcilla's article, "Why Aren't Philosophers and Educators Speaking to One Another?" agreeing that there is a problem but disagreeing about its scope and solution. The essay explores the role and responsibility of philosophers of education as mediators of cross-cultural communication between philosophers and educators and concludes…

Accepts the premise of Rene Arcilla's article, "Why Aren't Philosophers and Educators Speaking to One Another?" asking how philosophers of education of a Deweyan character can occupy the intermediary position between philosophy and education with their different languages, contexts, and concerns. The essay uses examples from the work of Cornel…

Responds to Arcilla's article, "Why Aren't Philosophers and Educators Speaking to One Another?" denying there was ever much of an engagement between professional philosophers and educators but noting there was an audience for philosophy of education, particularly when addressing broad educational aims that could drive policy. The essay asserts…

Responds to Arcilla's article, "Why Aren't Philosophers and Educators Speaking to One Another?" noting complexities that complicate the answer and suggesting that they are indeed communicating if one accepts a broader definition of philosophers and educators. The essay asserts that little educational research and theory has had much influence on…

Responds to Arcilla's article, "Why Aren't Philosophers and Educators Speaking to One Another?" metaphorically taking philosophy and education to marriage counseling to explain their grievances against each other, critiquing gender segregation in these two endeavors, questioning whether this "marriage" should be saved, and concluding that each…

Responds to Arcilla's article, "Why Aren't Philosophers and Educators Speaking to One Another?" suggesting that philosophers and educators are actually speaking to one another, copiously and productively, though the conversation sometimes takes other, less direct modes. The paper asks whether they should be talking to each other, suggesting that…

Comments on several responses to Arcilla's article, "Why Aren't Philosophers and Educators Speaking to One Another?" asserting that Arcilla is correct and that there must be conversation between philosophy and education. The article recommends situated philosophy and concludes that demonstrating the viability of philosophy of education as a field,…

Suggests that while left-wing radical scholars and intellectuals are committed to the common good, it may be necessary to give up the abstract idea of doing good to discover pragmatically what doing good means. The article reviews the works of Peter McLaren and Paul Willis, discussing the need to step back and reflect on current global political…

Problematizes the established silence between philosophy and education, suggesting that what makes this silence uncanny for some are expectations rooted in the Deweyan tradition of philosophy of education. For others, this tradition ceased to be appealing because of latent tensions in its elementary conventions. The paper discusses hope for…

Examines the conception of autonomy promoted by four educational philosophers to justify education prescriptions, focusing on the extent to which they succumb to the charge that they describe persons free of any social connections and encumbrances. The paper suggests that to the extent that these conceptions are vulnerable to this charge, they are…