Peer reviewedERIC Number: EJ460528
Record Type: CIJE
Publication Date: 1992
Pages: N/A
Abstractor: N/A
Reference Count: 0
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0034-6543
Averaging Untransformed Variance Ratios Can Be Misleading: A Comment on Feingold.
Katzman, Steven; Alliger, George M.
Review of Educational Research, v62 n4 p427-28 Win 1992
Reanalysis of A. Feingold's examination of variability differences between males and females on several nationally normed cognitive test batteries does not yield substantially different conclusions, but the method of averaging variance ratios exaggerates the differences in male and female variability. Simply averaging ratios of variance can lead to illusory conclusions. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Tests, Females, Intelligence, Males, Ratios (Mathematics), Sex Differences
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Information Analyses; Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers: Averaging (Mathematics); Variability Measurement; Variance (Statistical); Variance Ratios
Note: Comments on "Sex Differences in Variability in Intellectual Abilities: A New Look at an Old Controversy" (A. Feingold) (see TM 516 469).


