NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
50 Years of ERIC
50 Years of ERIC
The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) is celebrating its 50th Birthday! First opened on May 15th, 1964 ERIC continues the long tradition of ongoing innovation and enhancement.

Learn more about the history of ERIC here. PDF icon

Showing all 11 results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shulock, Nancy; Moore, Colleen – Educational Policy, 2005
California's 1960 Master Plan for Higher Education promised all students a chance to pursue a baccalaureate degree by guaranteeing a place at one of the public 4-year institutions for all students who successfully fulfill a minimum set of requirements at a community college. However, capacity constraints in the state's public colleges and…
Descriptors: Postsecondary Education, Minority Groups, Master Plans, Community Colleges
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Grissom, Jason A.; Nicholson-Crotty, Sean; Harrington, James R. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2014
Several recent studies have examined the impacts of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) on school operations and student achievement. We complement that work by investigating the law's impacts on teachers' perceptions of their work environments and related job attitudes, including satisfaction and commitment to remain in teaching. Using four…
Descriptors: Teacher Attitudes, Work Attitudes, Federal Legislation, Academic Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gallagher, James J. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
Contract research has increased because of: agencies' time limits; governmental agencies' skepticism about academics' practicality; and a power struggle between government and universities for control of the information production business. Implications of the increase in contract research are discussed and recommendations are made. (MH)
Descriptors: Action Research, Contracts, Educational Research, Educational Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wehmeyer, Lillian B. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
The evaluation design described was used to aid the governing board to reach a policy decision about expanding the California Early Childhood Education program (renamed the School Improvement Program) in the Lafayette School District. Descriptions of procedures, question formats, audiences involved, and results are included. (MH)
Descriptors: Boards of Education, Decision Making, Early Childhood Education, Educational Planning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tucker, G. Richard – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
The position is taken that the effectiveness of bilingual education programs has not been adequately researched or evaluated. The lack of appropriate critical, empirical, or longitudinal studies is attributed to several factors. (MH)
Descriptors: Bilingual Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Needs, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wolf, Robert L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
The Judicial Evaluation Method (JEM) is useful for aiding decision-making bodies to formulate policies. Broad public participation in complex issues is provided by JEM. (The conceptualization, policy formulation stages, and participant roles are identified; and the model is applied in two case studies). (MH)
Descriptors: Community Involvement, Court Role, Data Analysis, Data Collection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Linn, Robert L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
The internal validity of the RMC models, especially Model A, is examined. Concern centers on limiting evaluation to cognitive outcomes, using constant percentile as the no-treatment expectation, and using norms for one test to establish the expected no-treatment performance level for another test. (MH)
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Compensatory Education, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jaeger, Richard M. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
A liberal interpretation of Section 151 of Public Law 93-380, to implement effective local evaluation of Title I programs, is supported. Weaknesses are cited: (1) nationwide impact data, (2) unsound aggregation of Title I achievement gains, and (3) lack of consideration of alternative evaluation methods. (MH)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Compensatory Education, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wiley, David E. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
Title I Evaluation models using uniform procedures and data collection for state and national comparisons are interpreted as federal endorsement of basic, common competencies in reading and mathematics. Basic competencies, content homogeneity, conversion methodology, and validity of the evaluation are discussed. (MH)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Basic Skills, Compensatory Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Monti, Daniel J. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
By means of a case study of the Saint Louis, Missouri school desegregation and reorganization program, administrative procedures for avoiding desegregation or creating an appearance of compliance are discussed. The strategies used include public relations, inbreeding of staff, coopting and/or dividing citizen action, and stalling for time. (MH)
Descriptors: Administrative Problems, Communication Problems, Community Involvement, Compliance (Legal)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stinebrickner, Bruce – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1982
Two kinds of jurisdictions are compared and contrasted to help identify what is--and is not--distinctive to dimensions of the political process. Areas where research is needed are identified. (PN)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Local Government, Policy Formation, Politics