Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 3 |
| Standard Setting | 2 |
| Test Construction | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1 |
| Concept Formation | 1 |
| Cost Estimates | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| Educational Development | 1 |
| Educational Theories | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Measurement:… | 5 |
Author
| Reckase, Mark D. | 5 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Showing all 5 results
Reckase, Mark D. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2006
Schulz (2006) provides a different perspective on standard setting than that provided in Reckase (2006). He also suggests a modification to the bookmark procedure and some alternative models for errors in panelists' judgments than those provided by Reckase. This article provides a response to some of the points made by Schulz and reports some…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Standard Setting, Reader Response, Regression (Statistics)
Reckase, Mark D. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2006
A conceptual framework is proposed for a psychometric theory of standard setting. The framework suggests that participants in a standard setting process (panelists) develop an internal, intended standard as a result of training and the participant's background. The goal of a standard setting process is to convert panelists' intended standards to…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Standard Setting, Evaluation Criteria, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewedReckase, Mark D. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1998
Considers what a responsible test developer would do to gain information to support the consequential basis of validity for a test early in the development. How the consequential basis of validity of the program would be monitored and reported during the life of the program is examined. The validity of the ACT Assessment is considered as if it…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Test Construction, Validity
Peer reviewedReckase, Mark D. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1989
Requirements for adaptive testing are reviewed, and the reasons implementation has taken so long are explored. The adaptive test is illustrated through the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale of L. M. Terman and M. A. Merrill (1960). Current adaptive testing is tied to the development of item response theory. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Educational Development, Elementary Secondary Education, Latent Trait Theory
Peer reviewedReckase, Mark D. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1995
An example application of portfolio assessment was developed and the model and estimates of reliability derived from the literature were then used to estimate the characteristics of an operational large-scale portfolio assessment program. Costs were estimated to put results in a realistic context. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cost Estimates, Educational Assessment, Educational Theories, Models

Direct link
