Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Source
| Educational Measurement:… | 9 |
Author
| Linn, Robert L. | 9 |
| Burton, Elizabeth | 1 |
| Drasgow, Fritz | 1 |
| Porter, Andrew C. | 1 |
| Trimble, C. Scott | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 9 |
| Opinion Papers | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Showing all 9 results
Linn, Robert L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2006
The question of what it means to follow the "Standards" is discussed. It is argued that the "Standards" consists of statements of general principles, and that interpretation for specific applications requires professional judgment. As a result, disagreements among professionals on the applicability of particular standards to specific situations…
Descriptors: Standards, Accountability, Educational Testing, Context Effect
Porter, Andrew C.; Linn, Robert L.; Trimble, C. Scott – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2005
The No Child Left Behind Act allows states to vary (a) the trajectories they select to move from the baseline percent proficient or above in 2002 to the 100% proficient goal in 2014, (b) the minimum number of students required for reporting of disaggregated subgroup results, and (c) whether or not they will use confidence intervals when…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Policy, State Legislation
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1998
The focus is on partitioning the evaluation of the consequences of assessment programs among the sponsors, developers, users, and reviewers of tests. Five parties that share responsibility are discussed: (1) the state legislature, (2) the state board of education, (3) the school district, (4) the test publisher, and (5) the measurement profession.…
Descriptors: Boards of Education, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1997
It is argued that consequential validity is a concept worth considering. The solution to defining "validity" is not to narrow the concept, but to allow for the differential prediction provided by tests in different circumstances. Consequences of the uses and interpretations of test scores are central to their evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L.; Drasgow, Fritz – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1987
This article discusses the application of the Golden Rule procedure to items of the Scholastic Aptitude Test. Using item response theory, the analyses indicate that the Golden Rule procedures are ineffective in detecting biased items and may undermine the reliability and validity of tests. (Author/JAZ)
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Difficulty Level, Item Analysis, Latent Trait Theory
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1982
Confusion in the terminology used in criterion-referenced measurement specifications and development and standard setting and the attendant role of cut-off scores are shown to need practical clarification through psychometric research on test applications and consequences. (CM)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Measurement Objectives
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1994
The term "criterion-referenced measurement" has been so frequently used that accumulated surplus meaning has sometimes swamped the fundamental concept. Stripping away extraneous interpretations affirms the contemporary relevance of the concept. Substituting the term "construct-referenced" underscores the need for better conceptualizations of…
Descriptors: Behaviorism, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Learning
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L.; And Others – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1990
Results of a 1987 report--indicating that elementary students of all 50 states were above the national average--were assessed via 2 national mail and telephone surveys. Although results of data for 35 states support the general findings of the 1987 report, it appears that more specific results are less sensational. (TJH)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L.; Burton, Elizabeth – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1994
Generalizability of performance-based assessment scores across raters and tasks is examined, focusing on implications of generalizability analyses for specific uses and interpretations of assessment results. Although it seems probable that assessment conditions, task characteristics, and interactions with instructional experiences affect the…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Experience, Generalizability Theory, Interaction

Direct link
