Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
| Educational Measurement:… | 8 |
Author
| Brennan, Robert L. | 8 |
| Brown, William | 1 |
| Dodd, Barbara | 1 |
| Forsyth, Robert A. | 1 |
| Frisbie, David A. | 1 |
| Hambleton, Ronald K. | 1 |
| Johnson, Eugene G. | 1 |
| Lee, Guemin | 1 |
| Mehrens, William A. | 1 |
| Nellhaus, Jeff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 8 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Book/Product Reviews | 1 |
| Guides - Classroom - Learner | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Showing all 8 results
Peer reviewedBrennan, Robert L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2001
Discusses some problems, pitfalls, and paradoxes that challenge measurement theory and practice, especially for K-12 achievement testing. Considers a number of technical issues, especially some related to reliability. Also discusses a number of practical or political issues related to validation and accountability. (SLD)
Descriptors: Accountability, Achievement Tests, Educational Testing, Educational Theories
Peer reviewedHambleton, Ronald K.; Brennan, Robert L.; Brown, William; Dodd, Barbara; Forsyth, Robert A.; Mehrens, William A.; Nellhaus, Jeff; Reckase, Mark; Rindone, Douglas; van der Linden, Wim J.; Zwick, Rebecca – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2000
Responds to a negative evaluation of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and asserts that a review of the evidence for the NAEP performance standards indicates that there is support for the current approach to NAEP standard setting. Considers the scholarship of the NAS evaluation…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Elementary Secondary Education, Program Evaluation, Standard Setting (Scoring)
Peer reviewedLee, Guemin; Brennan, Robert L.; Frisbie, David A. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2000
Presents a broad definition of "testlet" and suggests a framework for classifying types of testlets. Considers several issues that bear on the conceptualization of testlets and analyses of scores from tests composed of testlets. Suggests some research topics that seem particularly important to advancing the meaningful and appropriate use of…
Descriptors: Classification, Definitions, Models, Scores
Peer reviewedBrennan, Robert L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2000
Reviews some of the more salient conceptual features of generalizability (G) theory. Provides a framework for considering some misconceptions about G theory. Focuses on particularly prevalent or serious misconceptions. G theory provides a rich conceptual framework and tools for working with a defined universe, but it does not tell an investigator…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Models, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedBrennan, Robert L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1998
Explores the relationship between measurement theory and practice, considering five broad categories of: (1) models, assumptions, and terminology; (2) reliability; (3) validity; (4) scaling; and (5) setting performance standards. It must be recognized that measurement is not an end in itself. (SLD)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Practices, Measurement Techniques, Models
Peer reviewedBrennan, Robert L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1997
The history of generalizability theory (G theory) is told from the perspective of one researcher's experiences, describing psychometric and scientific perspectives that influenced the development of G theory and its adoption. Work that remains to be done in the field is outlined. (SLD)
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Generalizability Theory, Measurement, Psychometrics
Peer reviewedBrennan, Robert L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1992
The framework and procedures of generalizability theory are introduced and illustrated in this instructional module that uses a hypothetical scenario involving writing proficiency. Generalizability analyses are useful for understanding the relative importance of various sources of error and for designing efficient measurement procedures. (SLD)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Data Interpretation, Equations (Mathematics), Error of Measurement
Peer reviewedBrennan, Robert L.; Johnson, Eugene G. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1995
The application of generalizability theory to the reliability and error variance estimation for performance assessment scores is discussed. Decision makers concerned with performance assessment need to realize the restrictions that limit generalizability such as limitations that lead to reductions in the number of tasks possible, rater quality,…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Educational Assessment, Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics)


