Publication Date
| In 2015 | 7 |
| Since 2014 | 32 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 104 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 194 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 377 |
Descriptor
Source
| Educational Evaluation and… | 931 |
Author
| Borman, Geoffrey D. | 10 |
| Lee, Valerie E. | 9 |
| Loeb, Susanna | 8 |
| Firestone, William A. | 7 |
| Guthrie, James W. | 7 |
| Levin, Henry M. | 7 |
| Porter, Andrew C. | 7 |
| Gamoran, Adam | 6 |
| Odden, Allan | 6 |
| Raudenbush, Stephen W. | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 65 |
| Higher Education | 51 |
| Elementary Education | 49 |
| High Schools | 32 |
| Middle Schools | 24 |
| Postsecondary Education | 23 |
| Secondary Education | 19 |
| Kindergarten | 17 |
| Grade 4 | 13 |
| Grade 8 | 13 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
| Policymakers | 6 |
| Practitioners | 4 |
| Administrators | 1 |
Showing 931 to 931 of 931 results
Peer reviewedKing, Jennifer A. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1994
The following models targeting at-risk elementary students are compared for cost: (1) Success for All (Robert Slavin), (2) Accelerated Schools (Henry Levin), and (3) School Development Program (James Comer). The Slavin model is the most costly in expenditure, and the Levin model requires the most additional staff time. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cost Effectiveness, Educational Change, Educational Finance


