Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Educational Assessment | 3 |
| Achievement Gains | 2 |
| Standards | 2 |
| Validity | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Compensatory Education | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Evaluation and… | 5 |
Author
| Linn, Robert L. | 5 |
| Baker, Eva L. | 1 |
| Haug, Carolyn | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Showing all 5 results
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L.; Haug, Carolyn – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2002
Studied the stability of accountability scores and gains for schools using fourth-grade reading results for schools (samples from 757 to 802 schools) in Colorado for 4 years of administration of the Colorado Student Assessment Program. Year-to-year changes were found to be quite unstable, resulting in a near zero correlation of the school gains…
Descriptors: Accountability, Achievement Gains, Correlation, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
The internal validity of the RMC models, especially Model A, is examined. Concern centers on limiting evaluation to cognitive outcomes, using constant percentile as the no-treatment expectation, and using norms for one test to establish the expected no-treatment performance level for another test. (MH)
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Compensatory Education, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1981
Results of field tests of the spring 1979 draft of the Standards for Evaluations of Educational Programs, Projects and Materials are discussed. Four derivative documents which have special relevance to, and are included in, the present discussion are a bibliography, a casebook, a methods handbook, and training materials. (RL)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Field Tests, Meta Evaluation, Standards
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1993
Current national efforts to expand the role of educational assessment and change the nature of assessments are discussed. Rationales for expectations that a new national examination would spur educational reform are analyzed; and the challenges of performance-based assessment, particularly in its validation, are examined. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Change, Educational Policy, Equal Education
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L.; Baker, Eva L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1995
The implications of international assessments in setting world-class performance standards are explored. Possible uses of recent international assessments as benchmarks against which to compare the achievement of U.S. students are illustrated. Characteristics of international assessments that affect their usefulness as benchmarks are discussed.…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Benchmarking, Comparative Analysis, Cross Cultural Studies


