ERIC Number: EJ1025397
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2014
Pages: 32
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: 67
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-1361-3324
Growing C-D-R (Cedar): Working the Intersections of Interest Convergence and Whiteness as Property in the Affirmative Action Legal Debate
Thompson Dorsey, Dana N.; Venzant Chambers, Terah T.
Race, Ethnicity and Education, v17 n1 p56-87 2014
In this article we extend Bell's work on interest convergence by using Harris' work on whiteness as property to articulate a cycle of interest convergence, interest divergence, and imperialistic reclamation, or convergence-divergence-reclamation (C-D-R, pronounced "cedar"). We then apply the C-D-R cycle lens to the evolution of federal race-conscious affirmative action legal cases in higher education and state anti-affirmative action policies that have emerged since the implementation of Civil Rights Act of 1964, and how these legal cases and policies are emblematic of the convergence, divergence, or reclamation periods. We also explore the incessant legal and political debate regarding race-conscious admissions policies.
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Race, Admission Criteria, College Admission, Whites, Civil Rights Legislation, Court Litigation, Critical Theory, Educational History, College Applicants
Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers: Civil Rights Act 1964; Grutter et al v Bollinger et al; Defunis v Odegaard; Bakke v Regents of University of California; Gratz et al v Bollinger et al; Brown v Board of Education; Hopwood v Texas; Oklahoma City Public Schools v Dowell

Peer reviewed
Direct link
