NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
50 Years of ERIC
50 Years of ERIC
The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) is celebrating its 50th Birthday! First opened on May 15th, 1964 ERIC continues the long tradition of ongoing innovation and enhancement.

Learn more about the history of ERIC here. PDF icon

Showing all 4 results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kuhn, Deanna; Wang, Yanan; Li, Huamei – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2011
In a pedagogical method increasing in popularity, students of all levels--from elementary to post graduate--are likely to be asked to engage in debate with peers. How they understand the purposes and values of argumentive discourse is likely to affect its effectiveness. The 3 studies presented here involve junior high school, senior high school,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Debate, Persuasive Discourse, Epistemology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peskin, Joan – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
There is growing consensus that, for trained readers, poetic-text processing involves a genre decision, which triggers genre-based conventional expectations and directs attention to the textual devices. This research examines how students recognize and process texts in poetic versus prose form at different points during their literary education.…
Descriptors: Grade 8, Grade 12, Language Processing, Prose
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Berman, Ruth A.; Nir-Sagiv, Bracha – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2007
In this study we argue that narrative storytelling and expository discussion, as 2 distinct discourse genres, differ both in linguistic expression and in their underlying principles of organization--schema-based in narratives and category-based in exposition. Innovative analyses applied to 160 personal-experience narratives and expository essays…
Descriptors: Linguistics, Conflict, Elementary Secondary Education, Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Walczyk, Jeffrey J.; Marsiglia, Cheryl S.; Johns, Amanda K.; Bryan, Keli S. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2004
The compensatory-encoding model (CEM) postulates that readers whose decoding of words or verbal working memory capacities is inefficient can compensate so that literal comprehension of text is not deleteriously affected. However, the use of compensations may draw cognitive resources away from higher level reading activities such as comprehension…
Descriptors: Grade 3, Semantics, Memory, Reading Comprehension