Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
| Higher Education | 7 |
| Court Litigation | 5 |
| Discipline | 4 |
| Student Rights | 4 |
| College Students | 3 |
| Colleges | 3 |
| Legal Responsibility | 3 |
| Student College Relationship | 3 |
| Academic Freedom | 2 |
| Compliance (Legal) | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of College and… | 7 |
Author
| Stoner, Edward N., II | 7 |
| Martineau, Bradley J. | 2 |
| Cerminara, Kathy L. | 1 |
| Detar, Corey A. | 1 |
| Nogay, Arlie R. | 1 |
| Ryan, Catherine S. | 1 |
| Shields, Maraleen D. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 7 |
| Information Analyses | 3 |
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 2 |
| Practitioners | 2 |
Showing all 7 results
Peer reviewedStoner, Edward N., II; Shields, Maraleen D. – Journal of College and University Law, 2003
Summarizes some of 2001's more interesting and important court cases regarding disciplinary and academic decisions by higher education institutions, commenting on their effects on case law. (EV)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Discipline
Peer reviewedStoner, Edward N., II; Martineau, Bradley J. – Journal of College and University Law, 2002
Reviews court cases in 2000, including "Schaer v. Brandeis University," which reveal that courts continue to defer to college and university decisions pertaining to students, whether in the academic or disciplinary context. (EV)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline, Higher Education, Legal Responsibility
Peer reviewedStoner, Edward N., II; Ryan, Catherine S. – Journal of College and University Law, 2000
Explains to colleges and universities the import of the Supreme Court' Title VII clarifications in the Burlington, Faragher, and Oncale decisions, discusses post-decision cases in the educational context, and recommends measures that educational institutions can take to safeguard themselves from discrimination and harassment complaints and…
Descriptors: Colleges, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Educational Legislation
Peer reviewedStoner, Edward N., II; Martineau, Bradley J. – Journal of College and University Law, 2000
Reviews court litigation in 1999 related to disciplinary and academic decisions. Overall, the courts continued to defer to the university's decisions regarding student behavior, especially if the decisions were classified as academic, and especially in cases where the universities followed guidelines they had established in their student…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, College Students, Court Litigation, Discipline
Peer reviewedStoner, Edward N., II; Detar, Corey A. – Journal of College and University Law, 1999
Reviews 1998 court cases related to disciplinary and academic decisions in institutions of higher education. Plaintiffs challenging disciplinary and academic decisions once again met with little success, and students were largely unsuccessful in their efforts to increase the level of process accorded them in the academic environment. (SLD)
Descriptors: College Students, Colleges, Court Litigation, Discipline
Peer reviewedStoner, Edward N., II; Cerminara, Kathy L. – Journal of College and University Law, 1990
A model student code is provided for use by college and university counsel in creating their own written student disciplinary codes. Commentary on each section of the model code offers practical reasons for inclusion and some suggestions on how college counsel might approach certain disciplinary issues. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Behavior Standards, College Administration, College Students, Discipline Policy
Peer reviewedStoner, Edward N., II; Nogay, Arlie R. – Journal of College and University Law, 1989
Review of coaching contracts from approximately 50 institutions of higher education led to development of a model contract. Guidelines for university counsel include stating explicitly all items that the university intends to provide as compensation and stating the exact terms of the contract and the repercussions if either side prematurely…
Descriptors: Athletic Coaches, Colleges, Compensation (Remuneration), Contracts
