Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
| Engineering Education | 4 |
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Teaching Methods | 4 |
| Active Learning | 2 |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 |
| Critical Thinking | 2 |
| Evaluation | 2 |
| Independent Study | 2 |
| Industrial Education | 2 |
| Instructional Systems | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Felder, Richard M. | 4 |
| Rugarcia, Armando | 4 |
| Stice, James E. | 4 |
| Woods, Donald R. | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Reference Materials - General | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Showing all 4 results
Peer reviewedRugarcia, Armando; Felder, Richard M.; Woods, Donald R.; Stice, James E. – Chemical Engineering Education (CEE), 2000
Describes the changes in teaching methods in engineering classrooms over the last 60 years and implementations by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) in curriculum not only of mathematics, science, and engineering fundamentals, but also communication and lifelong learning skills. Lists ABET Engineering Criteria required…
Descriptors: Active Learning, Chemical Engineering, Critical Thinking, Engineering Education
Peer reviewedFelder, Richard M.; Woods, Donald R.; Stice, James E.; Rugarcia, Armando – Chemical Engineering Education (CEE), 2000
Discusses the quality of instruction for communication skills and creative thinking skills in engineering education and the difficulties caused by the single-subject approach in different engineering majors. Provides alternative solutions to the problem such as irrelevant teaching methods, difficulties in implementing technology in classrooms, and…
Descriptors: Active Learning, Chemical Engineering, Cooperative Learning, Critical Thinking
Peer reviewedFelder, Richard M.; Rugarcia, Armando; Stice, James E. – Chemical Engineering Education, 2000
Questions teaching effectiveness in higher education and focuses on five points for the appraisal of teaching effectiveness: (1) educational goals; (2) performance criteria; (3) assessment process; (4) evaluation process; and (5) educational scholarship. Explains how to evaluate teaching effectiveness. (Contains 14 references.) (YDS)
Descriptors: Engineering Education, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Instructional Effectiveness
Peer reviewedFelder, Richard M.; Stice, James E.; Rugarcia, Armando – Chemical Engineering Education, 2000
Explains the status of undergraduate instruction at research institutions in the past half century and discusses effective teaching strategies and methods. Lists components to create a positive teaching climate for instructors. (Contains 28 references.) (YDS)
Descriptors: Educational Change, Educational History, Educational Technology, Engineering Education


