Publication Date
| In 2015 | 1 |
| Since 2014 | 1 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Academic Achievement | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Teacher Effectiveness | 2 |
| Teacher Evaluation | 2 |
| Credibility | 1 |
| Data | 1 |
| Educational Testing | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Mathematics Achievement | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Carnegie Foundation for the… | 2 |
Author
| Loeb, Susanna | 2 |
| Candelaria, Christopher A. | 1 |
| Goldhaber, Dan | 1 |
| Harris Douglas N. | 1 |
| McCaffrey, Daniel F. | 1 |
| Raudenbush, Stephen W. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Showing all 2 results
Download full textGoldhaber, Dan; Harris Douglas N.; Loeb, Susanna; McCaffrey, Daniel F.; Raudenbush, Stephen W. – Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2015
It is common knowledge that teacher quality is a key in-school factor affecting student achievement. While the quality of teaching clearly matters for how much students learn, this quality is challenging to measure. Evaluating teacher quality based on the level of their students' end-of-year test scores has been one method of assessing…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Teacher Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques
Loeb, Susanna; Candelaria, Christopher A. – Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2012
Value-added models measure teacher performance by the test score gains of their students, adjusted for a variety of factors such as the performance of students when they enter the class. The measures are based on desired student outcomes such as math and reading scores, but they have a number of potential drawbacks. One of them is the…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Teacher Effectiveness, Scores, Peer Influence
