Publication Date
| In 2015 | 1 |
| Since 2014 | 1 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Academic Achievement | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Teacher Effectiveness | 2 |
| Teacher Evaluation | 2 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Background | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Credibility | 1 |
| Data | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Carnegie Foundation for the… | 2 |
Author
| Goldhaber, Dan | 2 |
| Harris Douglas N. | 1 |
| Loeb, Susanna | 1 |
| McCaffrey, Daniel F. | 1 |
| Raudenbush, Stephen W. | 1 |
| Theobald, Roddy | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Showing all 2 results
Goldhaber, Dan; Harris Douglas N.; Loeb, Susanna; McCaffrey, Daniel F.; Raudenbush, Stephen W. – Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2015
It is common knowledge that teacher quality is a key in-school factor affecting student achievement. While the quality of teaching clearly matters for how much students learn, this quality is challenging to measure. Evaluating teacher quality based on the level of their students' end-of-year test scores has been one method of assessing…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Teacher Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques
Goldhaber, Dan; Theobald, Roddy – Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2012
There are good reasons for re-thinking teacher evaluation. Evaluation systems in most school districts appear to be far from rigorous. A recent study showed that more than 99 percent of teachers in a number of districts were rated "satisfactory," which does not comport with empirical evidence that teachers differ substantially from each other in…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Evidence, Teacher Evaluation, Educational Testing


