Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 1 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Audio Equipment | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Formative Evaluation | 1 |
| Grades (Scholastic) | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 1 |
| Student Attitudes | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Canadian Journal for the… | 2 |
Author
| DiBattista, David | 2 |
| Kurzawa, Laura | 1 |
| Martini, Tanya | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Showing all 2 results
Peer reviewed
Download full textMartini, Tanya; DiBattista, David – Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2014
This study examined whether audio feedback provided to undergraduates (N=51) about one paper would prove beneficial in terms of improving their grades on another, unrelated paper of the same type. We examined this issue both in terms of student "beliefs" about learning transfer, as well as their "actual ability" to transfer…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Audio Equipment, Transfer of Training, Undergraduate Students
Direct linkDiBattista, David; Kurzawa, Laura – Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2011
Because multiple-choice testing is so widespread in higher education, we assessed the quality of items used on classroom tests by carrying out a statistical item analysis. We examined undergraduates' responses to 1198 multiple-choice items on sixteen classroom tests in various disciplines. The mean item discrimination coefficient was +0.25, with…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Item Analysis, Student Evaluation, Testing
