Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Interrater Reliability | 2 |
| Scoring Rubrics | 2 |
| Student Evaluation | 2 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Critical Thinking | 1 |
| Humanities | 1 |
Source
| Assessment Update | 2 |
Author
| RiCharde, R. Stephen | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Showing all 2 results
RiCharde, R. Stephen – Assessment Update, 2009
This article presents the author's response to Arend Flick. The author states that Flick is correct that the issue of rubrics is broader than interrater reliability, though it is the assessment practitioner's primary armament against what the author has heard dubbed "refried bean counting" (insinuating that assessment statistics are not just bean…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Scoring Rubrics, Critical Thinking, Student Evaluation
RiCharde, R. Stephen – Assessment Update, 2008
A persistent conflict between assessment professionals and faculty members in the humanities seems to focus inevitably on resistance to the concept of interrater reliability. While humanities faculty are often willing to engage in course-embedded assessment that uses some type of scoring rubric, when the demand for agreement in scoring is…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Humanities, Scoring Rubrics, College Faculty

Peer reviewed
Direct link
