Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| College Outcomes Assessment | 2 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Criticism | 1 |
| Humanities | 1 |
| Interrater Reliability | 1 |
| Negative Attitudes | 1 |
| Program Evaluation | 1 |
| Scoring Rubrics | 1 |
| Standards | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessment Update | 2 |
Author
| Flick, Arend | 2 |
| Axelson, Rick D. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
Showing all 2 results
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAxelson, Rick D.; Flick, Arend – Assessment Update, 2009
At a recent assessment workshop, one of the authors' colleagues, Andrew Stuart Bergerson, offered a novel metaphor for building their university's assessment program. "We need to spread the assessment virus on campus," Drew remarked, half seriously. Although they had a good laugh over this image at the time, it encapsulates the faculty-driven…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Teacher Attitudes, Negative Attitudes, Program Evaluation
Flick, Arend – Assessment Update, 2009
This article presents the author's critique of R. Stephen RiCharde's argument in his essay on the humanities and interrater reliability in the July-August 2008 issue of "Assessment Update." RiCharde suggests that the humanities' historical commitment to a dialectical pedagogy, a "nonlinear" process that values disagreement and debate, is at odds…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Humanities, Scoring Rubrics, Student Evaluation
