Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
| Higher Education | 14 |
| Evaluation Methods | 7 |
| Educational Quality | 6 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 6 |
| Quality Control | 6 |
| Student Evaluation | 5 |
| College Faculty | 3 |
| Course Evaluation | 3 |
| Instructional Improvement | 3 |
| Program Evaluation | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Boyle, Patrick | 2 |
| Balla, John | 1 |
| Bowden, John A. | 1 |
| Brown, Ken W. | 1 |
| Bull, Joanna | 1 |
| Bullock, Kate | 1 |
| Chapple, Mary | 1 |
| Danielson, Mary Ann | 1 |
| Fairchild, Thomas N. | 1 |
| Fischer, Mary L. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 15 |
| Journal Articles | 15 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 10 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 4 |
| Administrators | 3 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Showing all 15 results
Peer reviewedStefani, Lorraine A. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1998
Most student assessment in higher education is undertaken with little or no consultation with students. To become effective, independent, autonomous learners, students must be enabled to understand assessment criteria and expected levels of attainment, and be empowered through meaningful feedback that relates to assessment criteria and improvement…
Descriptors: College Instruction, College Students, Feedback, Higher Education
Peer reviewedStephens, Derek; Bull, Joanna; Wade, Winnie – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1998
Reviews lessons learned from experience with computer-aided learning that can inform the use of computers in student assessment in college teaching, describes the experience of two institutions with computer-assisted student assessment, and makes recommendations for developing and implementing effective institution-wide systems. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education
Peer reviewedBoyle, Patrick; Bowden, John A. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1997
Presents a model of quality assurance for colleges and universities, distilled from key concepts in the literature about quality assurance and higher education culture and practice. The model has continuous quality improvement in student learning at its center, and includes elements of institutional values, faculty evaluation and development,…
Descriptors: Accountability, College Environment, Educational Quality, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedChapple, Mary; Murphy, Roger – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1996
The Nominal Group Technique, in which groups of students jointly evaluate a course, is proposed as an alternative to individual course evaluation questionnaires for student assessment of college teacher performance. Evaluation of a new course by three cohorts of students using the technique is reported. Strengths and weaknesses emerging in the…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Course Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewedWoodhouse, David – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1995
Strategies for promoting efficient control of quality in colleges and universities are examined. It is proposed that integration of external review and institutional self-evaluation can be used to support the goals of accountability, efficiency, and institutional effectiveness. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, Educational Quality, Efficiency, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedHollwitz, John; Danielson, Mary Ann – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1995
Two procedures for systematic organizational quality assessment are presented: (1) a distributional assessment to monitor individual, group, or unit performance by establishing real and maximum-feasibility parameters; and (2) a cost-assessment system based on utility analysis, to assign dollar values and benefits to quality interventions targeting…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Costs, Educational Quality, Institutional Characteristics
Peer reviewedWatson, Dawn E. R.; And Others – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1995
A Victoria University of Technology (Australia) project designed to harness the interdisciplinary and collegial culture of the institution to implement Total Quality Management principles is reported. The successful project stressed the value of culture binding through transformative processes in quality improvement. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Environment, College Faculty, Collegiality, Educational Quality
Peer reviewedBrown, Ken W.; Fischer, Mary L. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1994
Performance measures are discussed for assessing organizational effectiveness in nonprofit organizations including institutions of higher education. With hundreds of possible measures, ratios, and data available, the nonprofit manager must select measures that portray the institution's condition and performance. A process and rationale for…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Institutional Research
Peer reviewedImrie, Bradford W. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1995
The use of taxonomies of types and levels of learning for student assessment in higher education is discussed. Five taxonomies designed for a variety of instructional areas are described. The reasons for their use are examined from four points of view: pedagogical, professional, quality assurance, and management. (MSE)
Descriptors: Classification, Classroom Techniques, Cognitive Processes, Educational Quality
Peer reviewedMiller, C. A. – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1988
A British university's experience has shown that, with appropriate software and management methods, most of the practical problems in using student questionnaires to evaluate courses can be overcome. (MSE)
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Computer Software, Computer Uses in Education, Confidentiality
Peer reviewedNicholls, S. Howard – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1985
It is suggested that external examiners play a significant role in establishing and maintaining the quality of courses and that greater openness and agreed-upon standards would improve both assessment and learning. Specific suggestions are provided. (MSE)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Instructional Improvement, Standards, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewedRutherford, Desmond – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1987
Possible indicators for use in monitoring individual and departmental performance in teaching and research are explored. It is proposed that a sensitive but economical system of performance indicators could ensure that the professional development of faculty and departmental and institutional planning could proceed more realistically and…
Descriptors: Departments, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Development, Higher Education
Peer reviewedFairchild, Thomas N. – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1981
A self-evaluation system for college faculty time analysis is described and the forms used for record-keeping are presented. The system permits: documentation of types and amounts of services made available; accuracy of accounting; ease in federal grant auditing; development of job descriptions for prospective employees; and personal time…
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, Faculty Workload, Higher Education
Peer reviewedBullock, Kate; Scott, Bill – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1992
This article describes the composite thinking and support underpinning the evaluations of initiatives funded by Enterprise Awareness in Teacher Education, a British teacher education program component in which graduates are placed in industrial, commercial, and community contexts to learn about enterprise. Focus is on issues to be addressed before…
Descriptors: Business Education, Economics, Educational Innovation, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedBalla, John; Boyle, Patrick – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1994
A framework for improving student and course evaluation in higher education is presented. The framework is based on a simple quality control model. Suggestions for support mechanisms and resources for improving practice are also offered. (MSE)
Descriptors: Change Strategies, College Students, Course Evaluation, Educational Improvement


