This qualitative study follows two previous papers that presented quantitative data about methods of peer assessment within a group project and indicated that holistic peer assessment supports the purposes of summative group assessment better than category-based peer assessment. This study's findings support that notion. Student attitudes were…

Students undertook a group assignment and assessed each other's contributions using two approaches: holistic and category-based. Holistic assessment yielded more groups who awarded members equal marks and a greater proportion of students with a large gain or loss of marks compared to other group members. Findings indicated that the holistic…

A study compared the performance of heterogeneous and homogeneous instructional groups, and of individuals within these groups, when group members all received the same grade. High-ability students obtained lower grades in heterogeneous groups than in homogeneous groups, with the reverse true for lower-ability students. Lower-ability students…

A survey of United Kingdom universities investigated the nature and extent of group learning/group assessment in undergraduate computer science courses. Qualitative and quantitative data assessed amount and control of group learning/group assessment, methods of grading groups, and teachers' attitudes toward groups. Results show the approach to be…

The literature pertaining to evaluation of student work in groups is reviewed, and a number of group assessment methods are identified. Two alternative methods used at the University of Sunderland (England) are described. Issues and practical considerations in peer and self-evaluation of work in groups are also examined, particularly the tendency…