Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 4 |
| Student Evaluation | 4 |
| Foreign Countries | 3 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Academic Achievement | 2 |
| Business Administration… | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Grading | 2 |
| Academic Ability | 1 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Chansarkar, B. A. | 4 |
| Raut-Roy, U. | 1 |
| Rautroy, U. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
Showing all 4 results
Peer reviewedChansarkar, B. A. – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1985
A British polytechnic's first experiences with having one segment of a major examination be known to students ahead of time is discussed, and an empirical comparison of this and the traditional test type is presented. (MSE)
Descriptors: Business Administration Education, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedChansarkar, B. A.; Rautroy, U. – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1981
A business administration program in England introduced the use of formative (20 percent) as well as summative (80 percent) evaluation in assessing student performance. Since the practice began in 1974 it seems to have helped improve student grades in all subjects it affects. (MSE)
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Business Administration Education, Comparative Analysis, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedChansarkar, B. A. – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1989
A trend among European business administration courses to collaborate on a joint degree basis with other institutions in Europe is discussed. The performance of students from England, France and Germany on a common business administration course was examined. The German students performed better than both the British and French students.…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Business Administration, College Students, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedChansarkar, B. A.; Raut-Roy, U. – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1987
Student performance on an undergraduate honors degree was examined using four different assessment methods (traditional examinations, examination on questions seen ahead of testing, case studies, and student projects). Performance is best when a variety of evaluation methods are combined and that weaker students perform best when traditional…
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Academic Achievement, Case Studies, Comparative Analysis


