NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
50 Years of ERIC
50 Years of ERIC
The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) is celebrating its 50th Birthday! First opened on May 15th, 1964 ERIC continues the long tradition of ongoing innovation and enhancement.

Learn more about the history of ERIC here. PDF icon

Showing 76 to 90 of 172 results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhao, Cecilia Guanfang; Llosa, Lorena – Assessing Writing, 2008
Despite the debate among writing researchers about its viability as a pedagogical tool in writing instruction [e.g., Helms-Park, R., & Stapleton, P. (2003). "Questioning the importance of individualized voice in undergraduate L2 argumentative writing: An empirical study with pedagogical implications." "Journal of Second Language Writing," 12 (3),…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Second Language Instruction, Writing Tests, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lee, Icy – Assessing Writing, 2007
While much of L2 teacher feedback research has focused on the effectiveness of feedback and its impact on student revision and writing, little has been done to examine teachers' feedback in the larger classroom context of teaching and learning to ascertain the functions teacher feedback serves from an assessment-for-learning perspective. Using…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Second Language Instruction, Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Carroll, David W. – Assessing Writing, 2007
Two studies assessed student writing in a critical thinking course. The first study examined initial and final versions of a term paper. Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC) analyses of essays revealed significant differences in linguistic variables and some differences in cognitive variables. The second study examined student essays at the…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Essays, Critical Thinking, Research Papers (Students)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Reinheimer, David A. – Assessing Writing, 2007
This study outlines a response to composition placement review based on the understanding that demonstrating validity is an argumentative act. The response defines the validity argument through principles of sound assessment: using multiple, local methods in order to improve program performance. The study thus eschews the traditional course-grade…
Descriptors: Placement, Validity, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Andrade, Glenna – Assessing Writing, 2007
In 2004, the Department of Writing Studies at Roger Williams University in Bristol, Rhode Island, the U.S., began an assessment of student outcomes for two first-year writing courses (Fall 04 to Fall 05) to evaluate performance on previously established criteria. A study of the students' Portfolio Assessment Sheets concluded that one pervasive…
Descriptors: Freshman Composition, Portfolio Assessment, Writing Evaluation, Faculty Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Todd, Richard Watson; Khongput, Somreudee; Darasawang, Pornapit – Assessing Writing, 2007
This study investigates the relationships between connectedness in discourse and the in-text comments that tutors write on postgraduate essays at a Thai university. Connectedness was divided into cohesion, propositional coherence and interactional coherence which were analysed using Hoey's lexical analysis [Hoey, M. (1991). "Patterns of lexis in…
Descriptors: Rhetoric, Discourse Analysis, Essays, Tutors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Knoch, Ute; Read, John; von Randow, Janet – Assessing Writing, 2007
The training of raters for writing assessment through web-based programmes is emerging as an attractive and flexible alternative to the conventional method of face-to-face training sessions. Although some online training programmes have been developed, there is little published research on them. The current study aims to compare the effectiveness…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Professional Training, Interrater Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Barlow, Libby; Liparulo, Steven P.; Reynolds, Dudley W. – Assessing Writing, 2007
This paper discusses the method, results, and implications of a study of undergraduate student writing at a large, diverse research university, and makes the case for grounding substantive writing assessment in local stakeholders and formative design. Data were collected from multiple sources: writing samples obtained from courses across…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Writing Evaluation, Student Evaluation, Research Universities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Beck, Sarah W.; Jeffery, Jill V. – Assessing Writing, 2007
High-stakes writing assessments currently exert a strong influence on the writing curriculum and instruction in schools across the United States. Under these circumstances it is important to examine the construct of writing competence on which these assessments are based, as well as the extent to which this construct supports the goals of…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Task Analysis, High Stakes Tests, Literary Genres
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Knoch, Ute – Assessing Writing, 2007
The category of coherence in rating scales has often been criticized for being vague. Typical descriptors might describe students' writing as having 'a clear progression of ideas' or "lacking logical sequencing." These descriptors inevitably require subjective interpretation on the side of the raters. A number of researchers (Connor & Farmer,…
Descriptors: Scripts, Rhetoric, Rating Scales, Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dysthe, Olga; Engelsen, Knut Steinar; Lima, Ivar – Assessing Writing, 2007
In this article, we present findings from a survey study of portfolio assessment practices in four Norwegian higher education institutions after a major educational reform had introduced more varied assessment forms, more compulsory writing and closer follow-up of students. The purpose behind the study was to map these newly emerging writing and…
Descriptors: Portfolios (Background Materials), Higher Education, Student Evaluation, Portfolio Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nixon, Rhonda; McClay, Jill Kedersha – Assessing Writing, 2007
The authors report on an interpretive case study that investigated how three elementary teachers summatively assessed their own students' written work over a three and one-half month period. Their collaborative assessment sessions reflected their ongoing routines that created productive social spaces that sowed the seeds for transformational adult…
Descriptors: Constructivism (Learning), Writing Evaluation, Student Evaluation, Writing Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Barkaoui, Khaled – Assessing Writing, 2007
Educators often have to choose among different types of rating scales to assess second-language (L2) writing performance. There is little research, however, on how different rating scales affect rater performance. This study employed a mixed-method approach to investigate the effects of two different rating scales on EFL essay scores, rating…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Rating Scales, Essays
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
James, Cindy L. – Assessing Writing, 2006
How do scores from writing samples generated by computerized essay scorers compare to those generated by ''untrained'' human scorers and what combination of scores, if any, is more accurate at placing students in composition courses? This study endeavored to answer this two-part question by evaluating the correspondence between writing sample…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Predictive Validity, Scoring, Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chai, Constance – Assessing Writing, 2006
If writing matters, how can we improve it? This study investigated the nature of writing plan quality and its relationship to the ensuing writing scores. Data were drawn from the 1998 Provincial Learning Assessment Programme (PLAP) in Writing, which was administered to pupils in Grades 4, 7, and 10 across British Columbia, Canada. Common features…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Grade 4, Writing Instruction, Correlation
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12