NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
50 Years of ERIC
50 Years of ERIC
The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) is celebrating its 50th Birthday! First opened on May 15th, 1964 ERIC continues the long tradition of ongoing innovation and enhancement.

Learn more about the history of ERIC here. PDF icon

Showing 1 to 15 of 18 results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Deane, Paul – Assessing Writing, 2013
This paper examines the construct measured by automated essay scoring (AES) systems. AES systems measure features of the text structure, linguistic structure, and conventional print form of essays; as such, the systems primarily measure text production skills. In the current state-of-the-art, AES provide little direct evidence about such matters…
Descriptors: Scoring, Essays, Text Structure, Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Plakans, Lia; Gebril, Atta – Assessing Writing, 2012
An increasing number of writing programs and assessments are employing writing-from-sources tasks in which reading and writing are integrated. The integration of reading and writing in such contexts raises a number of questions with regard to writers' use of sources in their writing, the functions these sources serve, and how proficiency affects…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Protocol Analysis, Writing Skills, Reading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Penny, James A.; Johnson, Robert L. – Assessing Writing, 2011
When multiple raters score a writing sample, on occasion they will award discrepant scores. To report a single score to the examinee, some method of resolving those differences must be applied to the ratings before an operational score can be reported. Several forms of resolving score discrepancies have been described in the literature. Initial…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Scores, Academic Achievement, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li, Jinrui; Barnard, Roger – Assessing Writing, 2011
Teachers' feedback on students' written work is an important aspect of pedagogy. However, theoretical views differ on what constitutes "good" feedback, both among applied linguists and academics in other disciplines. In-depth research needs to be carried out into the contextual difficulties of evaluating and assessing academic assignments, and the…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Assignments, Research Needs, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Aydin, Selami – Assessing Writing, 2010
Although portfolios in writing in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning are alternative tools, the portfolio process mainly concerns the decisions of language teachers rather than students' perceptions of portfolios. The present study aims to descriptively measure the perceptions of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students towards…
Descriptors: Portfolios (Background Materials), Student Attitudes, Writing Skills, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Erling, Elizabeth J.; Richardson, John T. E. – Assessing Writing, 2010
Measuring the Academic Skills of University Students is a procedure developed in the 1990s at the University of Sydney's Language Centre to identify students in need of academic writing development by assessing examples of their written work against five criteria. This paper reviews the literature relating to the development of the procedure with…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Writing Evaluation, Assignments, Psychometrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gebril, Atta – Assessing Writing, 2010
Integrated tasks are currently employed in a number of L2 exams since they are perceived as an addition to the writing-only task type. Given this trend, the current study investigates composite score generalizability of both reading-to-write and writing-only tasks. For this purpose, a multivariate generalizability analysis is used to investigate…
Descriptors: Scoring, Scores, Second Language Instruction, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Parr, Judy M.; Timperley, Helen S. – Assessing Writing, 2010
Traditionally, feedback to writing is written on drafts or given orally in roving or more formal conferences and is considered a significant part of instruction. This paper locates written response within an assessment for learning framework in the writing classroom. Within this framework, quality of response was defined in terms of providing…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Writing Evaluation, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hyland, Theresa Ann – Assessing Writing, 2009
Current concerns about academic plagiarism in student writing assume qualitative and quantitative differences in the writing of students for whom English is a first language (EL1) and English is a second language (EL2), but lack precision in measuring those differences. I examined the citation practices of EL1 and EL2 students in a timed writing…
Descriptors: Intellectual Property, Prior Learning, Rating Scales, Citations (References)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
James, Cindy L. – Assessing Writing, 2008
The scoring of student essays by computer has generated much debate and subsequent research. The majority of the research thus far has focused on validating the automated scoring tools by comparing the electronic scores to human scores of writing or other measures of writing skills, and exploring the predictive validity of the automated scores.…
Descriptors: Predictive Validity, Scoring, Electronic Equipment, Essays
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dysthe, Olga; Engelsen, Knut Steinar; Lima, Ivar – Assessing Writing, 2007
In this article, we present findings from a survey study of portfolio assessment practices in four Norwegian higher education institutions after a major educational reform had introduced more varied assessment forms, more compulsory writing and closer follow-up of students. The purpose behind the study was to map these newly emerging writing and…
Descriptors: Portfolios (Background Materials), Higher Education, Student Evaluation, Portfolio Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Martin, Deb; Penrod, Diane – Assessing Writing, 2006
In this article, the authors argue that evaluation courses grounded in assessment theory and situated within a cultural context of actual workplace practices enhances student learning. Giving students the tools that assessors, both formal and informal, use helps them learn to anticipate and generate those tools for writing situations they will…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Undergraduate Students, Work Environment, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Burke, Jennifer N.; Cizek, Gregory J. – Assessing Writing, 2006
This study was conducted to gather evidence regarding effects of the mode of writing (handwritten vs. word-processed) on compositional quality in a sample of sixth grade students. Questionnaire data and essay scores were gathered to examine the effect of composition mode on essay scores of students of differing computer skill levels. The study was…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, High Stakes Tests, Writing Processes, Grade 6
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
de Haan, Pieter; van Esch, Kees – Assessing Writing, 2005
This article presents the first results of the study of argumentative essays in English as a foreign language and in Spanish as a foreign language and as a native language, carried out at Radboud University Nijmegen (formerly the University of Nijmegen) between 2002 and 2008. The aim of the project is to compare teachers' holistic assessments with…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Essays, Writing Skills, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ostheimer, Martha W.; White, Edward M. – Assessing Writing, 2005
Estimates indicate that as much as 80% of an engineer's work time is spent on communicating. Studies done by the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) at the University of Arizona show that engineering firms, as well as ECE graduates, rank writing ability as the most important skill in determining engineers' success, even above…
Descriptors: Portfolios (Background Materials), Engineering Education, Speech Communication, Portfolio Assessment
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2