Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 3 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 4 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Source
| Assessing Writing | 4 |
Author
| Becker, William | 1 |
| Belanger, Secret | 1 |
| DelleBovi, Betsy M. | 1 |
| Jeffery, Jill V. | 1 |
| Saxton, Emily | 1 |
| Wu, Zunmin | 1 |
| Xu, Yun | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 4 |
| Secondary Education | 3 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Showing all 4 results
Xu, Yun; Wu, Zunmin – Assessing Writing, 2012
This paper reports on a qualitative research study into the test-taking strategies employed in completing two picture prompt writing tasks--Situational Writing and Interpretational Writing in the Beijing Matriculation English Test. Think-aloud and retrospective interview protocols were collected from twelve Chinese students representing two key…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, High School Students, Secondary School Teachers, Test Wiseness
DelleBovi, Betsy M. – Assessing Writing, 2012
This action research demonstrates the answer to this question: How can literacy professors provide effective training in evaluating writing to preservice graduate education students? The study examines writing assessment instruction in the context of a literacy course required of preservice teachers seeking secondary (7-12) certification in…
Descriptors: Literacy, Writing Evaluation, Graduate Students, Preservice Teachers
Saxton, Emily; Belanger, Secret; Becker, William – Assessing Writing, 2012
The purpose of this study was to investigate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Critical Thinking Analytic Rubric (CTAR). The CTAR is composed of 6 rubric categories: interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, explanation, and disposition. To investigate inter-rater reliability, two trained raters scored four sets of…
Descriptors: Scoring Rubrics, Critical Thinking, Interrater Reliability, Performance Based Assessment
Jeffery, Jill V. – Assessing Writing, 2009
Persistent gaps between optimistic state and pessimistic national academic performance assessment results are increasingly leading to calls for unified national standards in the US. Critics argue that these gaps reveal vast differences in how proficiency is conceptualized; however, little is known about how conceptualizations compare among…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Performance Based Assessment, National Standards, Performance Tests

Peer reviewed
Direct link
