Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Essays | 2 |
| Predictive Validity | 2 |
| Scoring | 2 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Electronic Equipment | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Student Placement | 1 |
| Validity | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessing Writing | 2 |
Author
| James, Cindy L. | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Showing all 2 results
James, Cindy L. – Assessing Writing, 2008
The scoring of student essays by computer has generated much debate and subsequent research. The majority of the research thus far has focused on validating the automated scoring tools by comparing the electronic scores to human scores of writing or other measures of writing skills, and exploring the predictive validity of the automated scores.…
Descriptors: Predictive Validity, Scoring, Electronic Equipment, Essays
James, Cindy L. – Assessing Writing, 2006
How do scores from writing samples generated by computerized essay scorers compare to those generated by ''untrained'' human scorers and what combination of scores, if any, is more accurate at placing students in composition courses? This study endeavored to answer this two-part question by evaluating the correspondence between writing sample…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Predictive Validity, Scoring, Validity

Peer reviewed
Direct link
