NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
50 Years of ERIC
50 Years of ERIC
The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) is celebrating its 50th Birthday! First opened on May 15th, 1964 ERIC continues the long tradition of ongoing innovation and enhancement.

Learn more about the history of ERIC here. PDF icon

Showing 421 to 428 of 428 results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rush, Jean C. – Arts Education Policy Review, 1995
Presents a collection of cantankerous opinions criticizing political correctness, abstract art, sympathy for AIDS sufferers, and arts advocacy. Contains a briefly coherent passage advocating serious and rigorous formal study. The rest amounts to little more than a conceptual mapping of rancorous reactions to the current state of affairs. (MJP)
Descriptors: Aesthetic Education, Aesthetic Values, Art Criticism, Art Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sterling, Carol – Arts Education Policy Review, 1995
Proposes an extension of the arts education/business community relationship moving beyond issues of patronage and support. Maintains that the complexity of the 21st-century economy and society will be well served by the flexibility and creativity manifested in arts education. Recommends national goals and standards for arts education. (MJP)
Descriptors: Art Activities, Art Education, Corporate Support, Educational Administration
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Madeja, Stanley S. – Arts Education Policy Review, 1995
Considers the interrelationship between ownership and manipulation of information, arts education, and the expansion of electric and information sources. Explains various ways that information can be controlled or restricted. Discusses problem areas of copyright and access and includes several suggested approaches. (MJP)
Descriptors: Art Education, Computer Uses in Education, Educational Change, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bresler, Liora – Arts Education Policy Review, 1995
Introduces the symposium on arts integration in other countries. Provides brief summaries of the papers included and biographical information on the authors. Authors include Andre Karpati and Emil Gaul on Hungary, Shifra Schonman writing from Israel, Gary E. McPherson discussing Australia, and David Best on England. (MJP)
Descriptors: Art Education, Comparative Education, Curriculum Design, Curriculum Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Karpati, Andre; Gaul, Emil – Arts Education Policy Review, 1995
Traces the history of the interdisciplinary approach to art education in Hungary. Begins with the acceptance of the Kodaly method in the 1970s during the communist regime. Continues with Hungarian independence and the adoption of the National Core Curriculum in the early 1990s. Includes a concise explanation of Hungary's educational system. (MJP)
Descriptors: Art Education, Art Teachers, Communism, Curriculum Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schonmann, Shifra – Arts Education Policy Review, 1995
Discusses the reasons for, and the reactions to, the marginalization of drama/theater education in the Israeli school system. Curricular reform introduced in the mid-1980s resulted in some improvement, however, school principal autonomy remains a major stumbling block. Recommends drama teachers seize the initiative and implement programs on their…
Descriptors: Art Education, Curriculum Design, Curriculum Development, Curriculum Enrichment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McPherson, Gary E. – Arts Education Policy Review, 1995
Presents a curriculum profile of arts education in Australia. The curriculum includes generic outcome statements organized around interrelated approaches. These include creating, making, and presenting, as well as arts criticism and aesthetics, and past and present contexts. The outcome statements range across eight levels of achievement. (MJP)
Descriptors: Art Education, Curriculum Design, Curriculum Development, Curriculum Guides
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Best, David – Arts Education Policy Review, 1995
Criticizes the idea of grouping the arts together in a single curriculum. Argues that such practice further marginalizes arts education, makes it easier for administrators to cut one generic budget, and ignores the distinct characteristics of separate art forms. Cautiously supports integrated activities while adamantly condemning integrated…
Descriptors: Art Education, Curriculum Design, Curriculum Development, Curriculum Enrichment
« Previous Page | Next Page
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  19  |  20  |  21  |  22  |  23  |  24  |  25  |  26  |  27  |  28  |  29