Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Administrator Responsibility | 2 |
| Court Litigation | 2 |
| Guidelines | 2 |
| Legal Responsibility | 2 |
| Sexual Harassment | 2 |
| Compliance (Legal) | 1 |
| Definitions | 1 |
| Federal Legislation | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| School Law | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| American Secondary Education | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Showing all 2 results
Peer reviewedEssex, Nathan L. – American Secondary Education, 1998
Based on the landmark "Gebser" Supreme Court decision, school officials may be held accountable when they are aware of alleged sexual misconduct involving a teacher and a student but fail to initiate corrective measures. Although districts have some latitude, they must follow guidelines and construct clear, enforceable policies. (MLH)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Court Litigation, Definitions, Guidelines
Peer reviewedMann, Richard L.; Hughes, William – American Secondary Education, 1998
The U.S. Supreme Court, in its June 1998 "Gebser" decision, held that school districts cannot be sued for damages under Title IX unless a school official knows about a teacher's sexual abuse of a student and fails to stop it. However, districts must comply with Title IX requirements and follow appropriate guidelines. (MLH)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Federal Legislation


