Publication Date
| In 2015 | 1 |
| Since 2014 | 3 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 8 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 20 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 33 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Problems | 33 |
| Evaluation Methods | 21 |
| Program Evaluation | 18 |
| Evaluation Research | 14 |
| Evaluators | 12 |
| Evaluation Utilization | 7 |
| Reader Response | 6 |
| Ethics | 5 |
| Foreign Countries | 5 |
| Accountability | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| American Journal of Evaluation | 33 |
Author
| Morris, Michael | 4 |
| Sridharan, Sanjeev | 3 |
| Benjamin, Lehn M. | 2 |
| Dichter, Harriet | 2 |
| Greene, Jennifer C. | 2 |
| House, Ernest R. | 2 |
| Philliber, Susan | 2 |
| Schwandt, Thomas A. | 2 |
| Shaw, Greg | 2 |
| Alkin, Marvin C. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 33 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 13 |
| Opinion Papers | 7 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 6 |
| Book/Product Reviews | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Education Level
| Adult Education | 8 |
| Early Childhood Education | 5 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Showing 1 to 15 of 33 results
Neal, Jennifer Watling; Neal, Zachary P.; VanDyke, Erika; Kornbluh, Mariah – American Journal of Evaluation, 2015
Qualitative data offer advantages to evaluators, including rich information about stakeholders' perspectives and experiences. However, qualitative data analysis is labor-intensive and slow, conflicting with evaluators' needs to provide punctual feedback to their clients. In this method note, we contribute to the literature on rapid…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Data Analysis, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Schwandt, Thomas A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
The relationship between theory and practice, or between theoretical knowledge and practical knowledge, is not a simple one, and rarely is it the case that theory is "applied" to practice. This paper aims to clarify the relationship by briefly discussing the nature of practical problems and the role that theoretical knowledge plays in…
Descriptors: Theory Practice Relationship, Evaluation, Evaluation Problems, Evaluation Utilization
Mohan, Rakesh – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
Eleven years ago, this author became the director of the Idaho State Legislature's Office of Performance Evaluations. As only the second person in that role, he considered the office and its function to be still evolving and because he understood legislative leadership to be interested in seeing evaluation work that could actually…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Advocacy, Public Agencies, Evaluation Problems
Chelimsky, Eleanor – American Journal of Evaluation, 2013
In this paper, the author argues that evaluation theory and practice interact insufficiently today, even though early evaluation theorists expected them to be closely intertwined. She views this limited connection as the result of differing interests on the part of theorists and practitioners, differing frequencies of dissemination, and differing…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Educational Practices, Educational Theories, Theory Practice Relationship
Chouinard, Jill Anne – American Journal of Evaluation, 2013
Evaluation occurs within a specific context and is influenced by the economic, political, historical, and social forces that shape that context. The culture of evaluation is thus very much embedded in the culture of accountability that currently prevails in public sector institutions, policies, and program. As such, our understanding of the…
Descriptors: Accountability, Public Sector, Participatory Research, Context Effect
Cooksy, Leslie J.; Mark, Melvin M. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2012
Attention to evaluation quality is commonplace, even if sometimes implicit. Drawing on her 2010 Presidential Address to the American Evaluation Association, Leslie Cooksy suggests that evaluation quality depends, at least in part, on the intersection of three factors: (a) evaluator competency, (b) aspects of the evaluation environment or context,…
Descriptors: Competence, Context Effect, Educational Resources, Educational Quality
Jackson, Suzanne F.; Kolla, Gillian – American Journal of Evaluation, 2012
In attempting to use a realistic evaluation approach to explore the role of Community Parents in early parenting programs in Toronto, a novel technique was developed to analyze the links between contexts (C), mechanisms (M) and outcomes (O) directly from experienced practitioner interviews. Rather than coding the interviews into themes in terms of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Semi Structured Interviews, Qualitative Research, Comparative Analysis
Benjamin, Lehn M. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2012
Why do we continue to see evidence that nonprofit staff feel like outcome measurement is missing important aspects of their work? Based on an analysis of over 1,000 pages of material in 10 outcome measurement guides and a focused literature review of frontline work in three types of nonprofit organizations, this article shows that existing outcome…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Nonprofit Organizations, Human Services, Community Development
Kumar, A. K. Shiva – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
This paper presents the author's comment on "Evaluation Field Building in South Asia: Reflections, Anecdotes, and Questions" by Katherine Hay. Hay raises a number of extremely relevant issues relating to evaluation field building in South Asia. In this paper, the author aims to underscore the importance of three priorities for initiating public…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Public Support, Program Evaluation, Advocacy
Grob, George F. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
The author enjoyed reading Katharine Hay's ambitious and humbling visions for evaluation field building in South Asia. She has successfully positioned herself on a high mountain with a wonderful set of binoculars that enable her to see the entire evaluation landscape of South Asia. She magically sees and describes significant historical forces and…
Descriptors: Evaluation Research, Evaluators, Foreign Countries, Accountability
Sridharan, Sanjeev; De Silva, Soma – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
The papers in this dialogue help develop evaluation as a field (both in South Asia and other regions). What comes through in all of the papers is both humility of where evaluation is as a field and imagination and ambition of where evaluators could be in the near future. Reading the papers in this forum makes them enthusiastic about being…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Aspiration, Foreign Countries
Benjamin, Lehn M.; Greene, Jennifer C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
Today's public policy discussions increasingly focus on how "networks" of public and private actors collaborate across organizational, sectoral, and geographical boundaries to solve increasingly complex problems. Yet, many of evaluation's key concepts, including the evaluator's role, assume an evaluand that is programmatically or organizationally…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Public Policy, Networks, Problem Solving
Daigneault, Pierre-Marc; Jacob, Steve – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
While participatory evaluation (PE) constitutes an important trend in the field of evaluation, its ontology has not been systematically analyzed. As a result, the concept of PE is ambiguous and inadequately theorized. Furthermore, no existing instrument accurately measures stakeholder participation. First, this article attempts to overcome these…
Descriptors: Concept Formation, Evaluation Methods, Participation, Test Construction
Philliber, Susan – American Journal of Evaluation, 2008
It is familiar in the world of systems building that funders start out saying they are not particularly interested in attribution, only to later begin using words like "prove" and "impact." Boards begin by asking for intelligent reflection from the 30,000-foot level and then suddenly want to know how many more children are ready for school.…
Descriptors: Systems Building, Program Evaluation, Reader Response, Evaluation Problems
House, Ernest R. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2008
Drug studies are often cited as the best exemplars of evaluation design. However, many of these studies are seriously biased in favor of positive findings for the drugs evaluated, even to the point where dangerous effects are hidden. In spite of using randomized designs and double blinding, drug companies have found ways of producing the results…
Descriptors: Integrity, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Experimenter Characteristics

Peer reviewed
Direct link
