NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
50 Years of ERIC
50 Years of ERIC
The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) is celebrating its 50th Birthday! First opened on May 15th, 1964 ERIC continues the long tradition of ongoing innovation and enhancement.

Learn more about the history of ERIC here. PDF icon

Showing 1 to 15 of 61 results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morris, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2015
This essay explores the implications of the zeitgeist that emerged in the United States during the 1960s for the conceptualization of ethical issues in evaluation and community psychology, and how perspectives from the latter field might enhance ethical practice in the former. Special attention is paid to articulations of social justice,…
Descriptors: Ethics, Psychology, Social Justice, Standards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bechar, Shlomit; Mero-Jaffe, Irit – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
In this paper we share our reflections, as evaluators, on an evaluation where we encountered Excessive Evaluation Anxiety (XEA). The signs of XEA which we discerned were particularly evident amongst the program head and staff who were part of a new training program. We present our insights on the evaluation process and its difficulties, as well as…
Descriptors: Coping, Evaluation, Anxiety, Contracts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Duggan, Colleen; Bush, Kenneth – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
What is different about the conduct of evaluations in conflict zones compared to nonconflict zones--and how do these differences affect (if at all) the ethical calculations and behavior of evaluators? When are ethical issues too risky, or too uncertain, for evaluators to accept--or to continue--an evaluation? These are the core questions guiding…
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluators, Conflict, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morris, Michael; Clark, Brittany – American Journal of Evaluation, 2013
Evaluators' experiences with being pressured by a key stakeholder to misrepresent findings were investigated in an anonymous survey of a random sample of over 2500 American Evaluation Association members; a response rate of 37% was obtained. Overall, 42% of the respondents had encountered misrepresentation pressure, with 70% of this subgroup…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Social Influences, Stakeholders, Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Trimble, Joseph; Trickett, Ed; Fisher, Celia; Goodyear, Leslie – American Journal of Evaluation, 2012
This contribution to the Ethics section is intended to foster discussion about the relationship between multicultural competence and ethics; a timely discussion especially in view of the release in 2011 of the American Evaluation Association's Public Statement on Cultural Competence (http://www.eval.org/ccstatement.asp). Over the course of 2011,…
Descriptors: Cultural Pluralism, Interpersonal Competence, Ethics, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Skolits, Gary J.; Woodard, Thelma; Morrow, Jennifer Ann; Kaesbauer, Susanne – American Journal of Evaluation, 2012
Evaluator training field experiences seek to reinforce applicable content knowledge and promote applied skills. For students, even a small-scale field experience focusing on limited components of a larger evaluation process can seem particularly challenging. Students often do not recognize the relevance of established evaluation resources capable…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Graduate Students, Evaluators, Field Experience Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Goodyear, Leslie – American Journal of Evaluation, 2012
Where do evaluators find resources on ethics and ethical practice? This article highlights a relatively new online resource, a centerpiece project of the National Center for Professional and Research Ethics (NCPRE), which brings together information on best practices in ethics in research, academia, and business in an online portal and center. It…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Ethics, Research Methodology, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brandon, Paul R.; Smith, Nick L.; Hwalek, Melanie – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
This article is third in a series of exemplary cases under the two current section editors. The first two cases (Brandon, Smith, Trenholm, & Devaney, 2010; Smith, Brandon, Lawton, & Krohn-Ching, 2010) profiled evaluations that had been designated as exemplary by professional associations. The present case profiles an evaluation organization:…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Professional Associations, Educational Practices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Campbell, David – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
In evaluating local policy implementation, workaround stories--accounts of deliberate efforts to evade, subvert, or even break rules or procedures in order to get the job done--are valuable evaluative indicators. By "backward mapping" (Elmore, 1979) from frequently mentioned workarounds, we can identify flawed elements of policy- or grant-making…
Descriptors: Policy, Evaluation, Ethics, Compliance (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morris, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
This essay explores the contributions of "Evaluation Practice" and the "American Journal of Evaluation" to our understanding of evaluation ethics. The review is organized according to the five Guiding Principles for Evaluators (Systematic Inquiry, Competence, Integrity/Honesty, Respect for People, and Responsibilities for General and Public…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Ethics, Inquiry, Systems Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thomas, Vinod – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
After some 65 years of international development assistance, it is still difficult to show the effectiveness of aid in ways that are fully convincing. In part, this reflects inadequacies in the evaluation systems of the bilateral, multilateral, and global organizations that provide official development aid. Underlying these weaknesses often are a…
Descriptors: International Programs, Program Development, Economic Development, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thomas, Veronica G.; Madison, Anna – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
This article argues that social justice should be included in evaluation education as a fundamental value in evaluation practice. A social justice orientation will provide students with a perspective that will enable them to challenge existing evaluation hegemonic ontological, epistemological, theoretical, and methodological practices that…
Descriptors: Social Justice, Field Experience Programs, Teaching Methods, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hendricks, Michael; Bamberger, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
Each year a great many evaluations are conducted of international development efforts around the world. These development evaluations study projects, programs, country-wide portfolios, policy reform efforts, and other topics of interest to funders, governments, program managers, and other involved stakeholders. Although some of these evaluations…
Descriptors: Program Development, Economic Development, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Russ-Eft, Darlene F. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
This paper examines the issues involved in the use of ethical standards related to social responsibility using the two ethical codes: the American Evaluation Association "Guiding Principles for Evaluators" and the Academy of Human Resource Development "Standards on Ethics and Integrity." This examination will take the perspective of an internal…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Integrity, Social Responsibility, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morris, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
Successfully providing guidance to others is no easy task. Such is the challenge faced by committees charged with developing guidelines for ethical professional practice. The process of establishing and revising the Program Evaluation Standards (Joint Committee, 1994), for example, is a multiyear task that must seems endless to participants: a…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Ethics, Standards
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5