Publication Date
| In 2015 | 0 |
| Since 2014 | 0 |
| Since 2011 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 1996 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 4 |
| Evaluators | 3 |
| Anxiety | 1 |
| Attribution Theory | 1 |
| Behavioral Science Research | 1 |
| Causal Models | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
| Credibility | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Scriven, Michael | 5 |
| Coryn, Chris L. S. | 2 |
| Cook, Thomas D. | 1 |
| Donaldson, Stewart I. | 1 |
| Evergreen, Stephanie D. H. | 1 |
| Gooler, Laura E. | 1 |
| Hartmann, David J. | 1 |
| Hattie, John A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Showing all 5 results
Cook, Thomas D.; Scriven, Michael; Coryn, Chris L. S.; Evergreen, Stephanie D. H. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
Legitimate knowledge claims about causation have been a central concern among evaluators and applied researchers for several decades and often have been the subject of heated debates. In recent years these debates have resurfaced with a renewed intensity, due in part to the priority currently being given to randomized experiments by many funders…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Research Design, Causal Models, Inferences
Coryn, Chris L. S.; Hattie, John A.; Scriven, Michael; Hartmann, David J. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
This research describes, classifies, and comparatively evaluates national models and mechanisms used to evaluate research and allocate research funding in 16 countries. Although these models and mechanisms vary widely in terms of how research is evaluated and financed, nearly all share the common characteristic of relating funding to some measure…
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Comparative Analysis, Resource Allocation
Peer reviewedDonaldson, Stewart I.; Gooler, Laura E.; Scriven, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Discusses the sources and signs of excessive evaluation anxiety in program evaluation and provides some strategies to help evaluators prevent and manage this common problem. Shows how more than technical skills are required to conduct high quality program evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Anxiety, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedScriven, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2001
Focuses on the ideal future of evaluation as a discipline, including evaluation in the nonacademic world and evaluation as it applies to elementary, secondary, and higher education. In the ideal future, evaluation will be fully accepted as a key discipline and will be fully used in rational discourse and policy decisions. (SLD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Higher Education
Peer reviewedScriven, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 1998
The first part of this paper discusses the nature of theories and why some understanding of this abstract subject is of value in the practice of evaluation. The second part looks at the dependence of good practice on a minimalist theory of evaluation and what such a theory entails. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Theories, Theory Practice Relationship

Direct link
