The impact of log-linear presmoothing on the accuracy of small sample chained equipercentile equating was evaluated under two conditions. In the first condition the small samples differed randomly in ability from the target population. In the second condition the small samples were systematically different from the target population. Results showed that equating with small samples (e.g., N less than 25 or 50) using either raw or smoothed score distributions led to considerable large random equating error (although smoothing reduced random equating error). Moreover, when the small samples were not representative of the target population, the amount of equating bias also was quite large. It is concluded that although presmoothing can reduce random equating error, it is not likely to reduce equating bias caused by using an unrepresentative sample. Other alternatives to the small sample equating problem (e.g., the SiGNET design) which focus more on improving data collection are discussed.