ERIC Number: ED288217
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 1987-Nov
Pages: 18
Abstractor: N/A
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
The Semantics of Cross-Examination: A Case Study of the Jean Harris Trial.
Schuetz, Janice
Use of communication theory in an analysis of the court proceedings of the Jean Harris murder trial suggests that Harris contributed to her conviction with her inconsistent use of language and her refusal to remain in low-profile. Harris' defense attorney attempted to portray her as an upstanding, well-bred member of the community, and as a powerless, unwilling part of a love triangle. To increase her credibility, the defense showed Harris to be a user of "high," or formal, public language. She was also portrayed as helpless and devastated when testifying in her defense, and frequently cried while speaking. The prosecution, however, demonstrated Harris' jealousy and propensity for murder in a letter written to Herman Tarnower, the victim, in which she used "low" or impolite, vulgar language, and in satirical poems she had written. Moreover, Harris damaged her credibility by offering too much information on the witness stand; by using direct, confrontational language when speaking to the prosecutor; by taking notes and making suggestions during the trial; and by offering direct objections to the judge. Analysis of Harris' trial suggests that attorneys should remind witnesses to avoid inconsistent language and maintain a subordinate role in the courtroom rather than try to upstage or overpower the prosecution. (Eighteen references are included.) (JC)
Publication Type: Reports - Research; Speeches/Meeting Papers
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A