ERIC Number: ED546379
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2012
Pages: 192
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: 978-1-2676-4370-4
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
An Empirical Test of Tinto's Integration Framework for Community Colleges Using Structural Equation Modeling
Santos-George, Arlene A.
ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, Illinois State University
This dissertation empirically tested Tinto's student integration theory through structural equation modeling using a national sample of 2,847 first-time entering community college students. Tinto theorized that the more academically and socially integrated a student is to the college environment, the more likely the student will persist through college. It is a longitudinal, linear model of the psycho-social interactions between a student and the academic and social systems of an institution to explain the drop-out behavior. While there has been support for this theory's application to four-year institutions, particularly residential institutions, there has been limited research on its application to community colleges. Two-year community colleges enroll non-traditional students with diverse backgrounds and educational goals, and have external commitments such as work and family. Using the U.S. National Center for Education Statistics' (NCES) Beginning Post-Secondary Students Longitudinal Study 2003-2004 (BPS: 04/09) dataset, this study was able to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis to measure Tinto's five latent factors of Pre-entry Attributes, Pre-entry Goals and Commitments, Academic and Social Integration After Entry, After-entry Goals and Commitments, and Outcomes. Thereafter, a structural equation model was specified showing the direct and indirect paths to Outcomes in Tinto's framework. Tinto's structural model was reduced to a four factor model (SEM 1), which explained 28% of the variance in Outcomes. An alternative model (SEM2) with two additional direct paths to Outcomes--from Pre-entry Attributes and from Academic and Social Integration After Entry--explained 48% of the variance in Outcomes. Both SEM models strongly supported that Academic and Social Integration After Entry have an effect on Outcomes, but only IF mediated by After-entry Goals and Commitments. After-entry Goals and Commitments had the most powerful direct effect (SEM 1: ß = 0.50, ? < 0.001; SEM 2: ß = 0.94 ? < 0.05) on Outcomes. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Structural Equation Models, Two Year College Students, Social Integration, Social Theories, Factor Analysis, Longitudinal Studies
ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Publication Type: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations
Education Level: Two Year Colleges; Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys: Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A