This article presents the author's comments on a set of articles representing an unusual collation of work by investigators from different parts of the world, using similar high-tech instrumentation and procedures to measure eye movements in infants who lie in a fairly constrained age range. Although the articles in this thematic collection share methodological successes and criteria woes, they are not oriented toward a common issue. Rather, they represent the investigatorial spread characteristic of a methodology that is still quite new--ranging across descriptive longitudinal work, paradigm development, attempts to identify the underpinnings of established perceptual transitions and to explore infants' conception of an object's behavior during occlusion. The author's comments on these articles are directed toward them, one by one.