Materials used in South Oklahoma City Junior College's faculty evaluation process are presented in these three booklets. First, the principles and guidelines applying to all areas of the faculty evaluation process are presented, including: (1) evaluation is dependent upon shared responsibility and rigorous professional judgments; (2) only agreed upon items are evaluated; (3) information upon which the evaluation is based should be known to both the faculty member and manager prior to the performance conference; (4) evaluation deals with quality rather than quantity and includes subjective and objective judgments; (5) evaluation is based on a non-exclusive set of standard indicators, and in any given area more than one indicator may be needed to derive a rating; and (6) special objectives (e.g., retention, recruitment, or staff development) are evaluated under the area of the evaluation form to which they apply. Next, principles and guidelines for specific areas to be evaluated are presented. The next two booklets contain the faculty self-evaluation form and the manager evaluation of faculty performance form, which provide criteria for judging faculty effectiveness with students, course learning materials, instructional programs, administrative functions, and college and community activities. These two forms present indicators of standard, below standard, and above standard performance and explain the weights to be assigned to each of the five evaluation categories. (HB)